>但對於音樂、軟體這類創作，我可不認為須要讓微軟繼續賺大錢，
>誰須要微軟的 R&D 了？

You are already enjoying 微軟的 R&D by stealing. You said you did not need something while you are enjoying it now?

> 有人會了分享而創作，有人為了金錢而創作，
> 我只能說你那幾位朋友寫的小軟體，最好以分享為目的來寫，
> 以金錢為目的那就搞錯方向了！

原來辛辛苦苦寫軟體來讓你"分享"
才是對的方向
小弟受教了

> 因為可以取代你朋友的軟體太多了，你朋友不寫了，Palm 也沒
> 因此不能用，不是嗎？

Palm沒有因此不能用
但是卻少了很多好軟體
尤其是中文的軟體

我認識的朋友是不多
但是我相信有著類似心情的創作者絕不只他們幾位

> 有創作不等於有報酬，這兩者間沒必然關係 ....

少了報酬作為誘因的創作
很難持久

> You are working not for salaries? For 分享?

我的工作是系統維護，並不是靠寫程式販賣維生的，
私下也寫過不少程式，這些程式只賣過一次而已，其他寫的
免費丟到網路上去都沒什麼人在用，那裏敢妄想寫個程式就要
能賺多少？現在我都以分享為目的寫程式了！

寫程式不一定有薪水，兩者間沒必然關係！

>現在我都以分享為目的寫程式了！

It is only your choice.  You cannot choose for others. You cannot represent all programmers.
Many people needed to get pay for 寫程式.
Don"t steal from them.

to mickey_mouse兄
我不太了解您的意思,不過就這裡的"結果",指的是個人對事情的認知結果.而我是想強調,對某些人而言,他的認知能力就只到某個程度.....講再多也沒用!.

> 結果.而我是想強調,對某些人而言,他的認知能力就只到某個程度.....講
> 再多也沒用!.

請不要侮辱人 ....

訂正：
我不"回"信了！

to jutso
如我的發言,讓您覺得被侮辱, 我向您道歉!!
Sorry

Interesting.  
However, the story does not trun someing immoral to moral.

I tell you another stories about Adobe abd Autocad.  They try very hard to catch illegal users from the very beginging since many years ago but still become very success.  They success by offering free software to school, students and government while charging high price from commercial company.

Your story about 國喬 just indicates the owner of 國喬 is stupid. What a pity.  It does not imply 盜版 is right.
When you use something that the owner require clearly stated price, pay for it.  If you use it but not pay it, it is stealing.  if you don"t want to pay, don"t use it. it is very clear.

No more excuses.

訂正：
However, the story does not trun "something" immoral to moral.