3asv71

網路會員

2004/03/03 10:01 請先登入後才可回應

器材: 其他其他

終於差不多儲夠錢換機啦，都係決定換菲林機，暫且唔玩數碼住，因為出相都係
菲林靚(不論正片定負片，連自己識既晒相師傅都係咁話，數碼都係傻傻地玩住
傻機先啦)

而家打算等月尾出埋30/33V先再決定要新版EOS 30/33V定舊版EOS 30/33，順便
可以儲多個月錢，今次換機budget大約預$10000內，雖然應該夠錢，而且識個朋
友可以０係代理拎貨，應該會平一(小)截(0卦?)，不過最好唔好太盡，如果唔係
比屋企人發現殺左我都似，閃燈方面應該會買支EX550，貪佢功能多，火力夠～
(如果最後爆budget或者會改買EX420 )

至於鏡頭方面，諗住會平平地買支50mm F/1.8玩下(如果有貨既話)，不過自己都
係偏向鍾意變焦鏡既方便，最常用影巴士影人既焦距都係28－200左右，另外影
明星function或演唱會時可能要去到300mm左右，不過都會分標準變焦鏡同遠攝
變焦鏡來買，唔會一支過玩晒28-300(雖然呢支都係自己選擇之列內，不過就算
買呢知，都會補多支長鏡玩遠攝)，至於要邊支希望大家就以下選擇比d意見(如
果比得落手既話．．XD)

標準變焦鏡暫時睇中呢幾支：
1.Canon 28-135 IS USM－冇得好講原廠野係好d，而且評語都唔差，不過要買呢
支，響遠攝鏡個邊0既budget就要屈就下啦

2.Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 II USM－同樣係要少30mm同IS就平一大截．－ˍ－

3.Tamron 24-135－睇過好多人既評語都話呢支鏡唔差，最重要係平過原廠支
28-135 IS)

4.Tamron 28-200/300 XR－又係睇中24-135後，衍生出來既另一個選擇，響雙
成睇過28-200好似賣緊$1800左右，28-300好似都係$2500唔駛，要黎平時當標準
變焦鏡都好似幾抵咁 XDDD

5.Sigma 24-135 /F2.8-4.5－反正都係副廠鏡，呢支就貪佢光圈比Tamron支大
一級光圈)

6.Tokina ATX 24-200mm F3.5-5.6－又係一支評價好似唔差既鏡(除左話用24mm
時有黑角之外)　

7.其他．．．唔知各位高手有咩好推介呢

而遠攝變焦鏡就睇中佢地．．．．
1.Canon小小白/小白－拎過朋友支擺落部EOS33度用，冇得好講，貴野係唔同
d，不過都係講下好了，買完後乜都唔駛要了，想玩呢0的"白色恐怖"都係等中六
合彩先(除非有人平讓比我啦:P)．．．而且白色鏡身似乎都唔多襯黑色機身吧?
(唉，冇錢買既藉口XDDD )

2.Canon 75-300 USM III－都係一支0岩自己range同價位既原廠鏡，不過搜尋
過之前既評語討論，成像好似話仲衰過副廠鏡．．

3.Tamron 70-300 LD marco－唔少人心目中既爛鏡，但自己用過覺得還可以，
起碼朋友都話用落我部爛鬼MZ-50度都仲快過佢部EOS33+原廠支75-300，不過之
前買過，而家換系統又用返同一支鏡好似怪怪地-_-

4.Sigma AF 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO MACRO SUPER II－有人話呢支鏡好過原廠支
75-300，唔知係咪真呢，係既真係會考慮下

5.Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 EX APO HSM－雖然自己都對Sigma鏡有少少疑慮，
不過用一支原廠小小白既價錢買到支接近原廠小白規格既鏡，或者都可以諗下既

6.其他．．．唔知各位高手有咩推介啦 :)

雖然都知好難揀架啦，不過冇辦法，一個半工讀學生既銀彈實在有限，好難話想
要咩就要咩，所以還望各位高手幫小第作個精明計劃或者比d意見，多謝多謝:)

KhaKiKhaKi 網路會員	41) 2004/03/04 15:10 PENTAX的確唔合年輕人.轉canon啦. >此話何解?
Arthur塗夫網路會員	42) 2004/03/04 15:30 Shoot shoot shoot till you identify the limitations of your system, before any serious upgrade. Upgrade is much more eaiser than shooting at cutting edge.
karry 網路會員	43) 2004/03/04 15:57 pentax因為保守落午(部機祗可以影相!又冇眼控;又冇45點對焦,又冇usm.又冇張連拍).死古古冇function. 用pentax=outdate(唔in);=不合年輕人.
Dibri 網路會員	44) 2004/03/04 16:13 to Karry: 佢冇USM但有POWER ZOOM, 仲有邊個話佢無連拍?至於眼控......我識大部份用CANON既多數都會disable this function....so what do you think? and the 45focus points... mainly very useful when you using AF Servo... but iu would like to use 1 point to pan vehicles... one thing i just want to say: each brand have its own characteristic... i"m using pentax and i"m 20~~~ so what do you think? of course, canon has the best technique on its developing camera, so if 3asv71 guy want to change system... you got the right choice to be canon but... the good quality lens... also expansive as CMPN...
Dibri 網路會員	45) 2004/03/04 16:15 sorry is AI servo
karry 網路會員	46) 2004/03/04 16:21 Dibri: 你唔夠IN LAW! 苯到死要苯人先可以用!先可以抵受別人歧視嘛. 唔洗冤枉錢點買沒用的新科技! 但POWER ZOOM真係幾食電.
KhaKiKhaKi 網路會員	47) 2004/03/04 16:30 pentax因為保守落午(部機祗可以影相!又冇眼控;又冇45點對焦,又冇usm.又冇張連拍).死古古冇function. 用pentax=outdate(唔in);=不合年輕人. ------------------------- 嘩~~咁我咪超老食并? 我用FM2嫁，又冇AF，又冇AE，對焦點係"零"點，冇連拍之餘仲要手動過片，影完仲要自己"搞"，FUNCTION係有光圈同快門，自拍SET死10秒，仲要唔係好準，縮光圈/景深預視都要手動唔係電子~ 小弟剛剛18~!
*香港至NET超人* 網路會員	48) 2004/03/04 16:30 玩PENTAX係因為佢Ｄ鏡, 唔係佢既機身. 好多新手都係貪機身夠PRO, 亦希望多人用易埋堆, 以PENTAX多年特性, 基本上只係適合老O野用, 尤其是鍾情於中古鏡頭果堆. 至於POWER ZOOM, PENTAX都唔再做, 証明係失敗之下, 不談也罷.
KhaKiKhaKi 網路會員	49) 2004/03/04 16:33 POWER ZOOM我未用過，但係都想像得到實用性超低，試問你一百張相之中有幾多張係用會到拉爆? 小弟係零張~~~ PS:其實係因為我唔用變焦鏡:P 要創新? MINOLTA啦，創新到你唔信
KhaKiKhaKi 網路會員	50) 2004/03/04 16:44 插個花，希望唔好介意(又試成頁我d post=-=")，唔即刻打低問轉頭會唔記得，然後今晚臨訓就諗起，跟住就會心思思集中唔到精神睇書=_= 點解canon人咁鍾意錐求550EX? 真係會成日用? 用手動機的人多數都唔"興"、唔鍾意用閃燈的...... 係咪因為大家影既題材唔同，af影人、mf影風景? 真奇怪~~~
*香港至NET超人* 網路會員	51) 2004/03/04 20:33 買CANON唔通用NIKON燈咩.....
cchsean 網路會員	52) 2004/03/04 21:25 3asv71 兄︰唉！睇左呢條 thread 咁耐，睇黎你講來講去，個心都係飛左去 Canon 個邊，不如下定決心，找找有乜野 Canon Body & Lens 好買仲好，免得夜長夢多。咁樣講唔係串你，而係我自己以前都有咁樣既經歷，免得痛苦者。
*香港至NET超人* 網路會員	53) 2004/03/04 22:24 咁用pentax就真係差好多, 代理屎過屎撈人, 鏡難搵過恐龍, 機身設計又保守, DSLR又只係得一部咁大把, 就連買個原廠鏡頭蓋都可以行穿對鞋.....
3asv71 網路會員	54) 2004/03/04 22:32 賓得落後？呢樣反而又唔覺wo，冇一d牌子咁多高科技花臣都唔代表係老餅落後，好似部ist 同istD，有晒業餘機既function，但就配上一個入門機身既年輕形象，不過形象年輕到連我都唔敢買:P(自問買機睇function之餘都幾睇外表 XDDDDD) 其實好多謝大家既意見，唔少意見都好有用同參考價值，不過最後我會點揀，都係等EOS30/33V出先作最後定論，仲有成個月諗，不過無論最後會點揀，都唔代表會放棄其他一套，好可能最後揀返用Pentax，到唔知幾耐之後又係轉投其他牌子懷抱，又或者最後揀左轉Canon，亦難保唔知幾耐之後又係回頭轉返Pentax都唔定，最好當然兩套機一齊玩啦 XDD．．或者咁樣試來試去某程度上都係另一樣趣味來呢(哈，講下好啦，就算有咁多時間去試去撞都冇咁多錢啦 XDDDDDDD) 仍然係新手一名，希望大家繼續指教啦 :)
3asv71 網路會員	55) 2004/03/04 22:36 咁用pentax就真係差好多, 代理屎過屎撈人, 鏡難搵過恐龍, 機身設計又保守, DSLR又只係得一部咁大把, 就連買個原廠鏡頭蓋都可以行穿對鞋..... ------------------------------------------------- 哈哈．．呢個真係事實，0個次同朋友去代理整某韓牌MP3機先知原來Pentax 係邊間代理同埋邊度係showroom．．不過佢地個showroom show出來既野原來都唔係多過乜成物成好多，死未?!~_~
Vincent★帝國天使論壇版主	56) 2004/03/04 22:57 希望MZ3唔好停產啦...
KhaKiKhaKi 網路會員	57) 2004/03/04 23:26 希望MZ3唔好停產啦... >都停左好耐啦~ >你應該話: >希望pentax出部正過MZ-3嫁啦買CANON唔通用NIKON燈咩..... >唔係講咩牌子咩型號既問題，而係閃燈似乎係好多買af機人士既必備架親，講550EX只不過係因為佢好似特別受到"錐棒" 我既問題其實係: 點解用af機既人寧願買少支鏡都要買閃燈先? 係咪因為大家影既題材唔同，af影人、mf影風景?
Barryyeung 網路會員	58) 2004/03/05 00:06 If I have a mz-50 and two zoom lens like 3asv71, I will make these upgrade: MZ-6 body for $1600 or MZ-5 for $2200 ( at stanly street, new old stock ) - both of them can use old manual pentax lens or even M42 lens, which is good and cheap 2nd hand Pentax AF220T ( at tin cheung ) for $300 - with bounce head for $300 pentax 28-70MM F4 for $11XX - budget fixed aperture lens 2nd hand pentax 50MM lens for under $500 use two old tele zoom, since I need 300MM and won"t paid for a F2.8 fixed aperture tele-zoom. total $3600 - $4000 For Me, if I can find a new MZ-3 or MZ-5N and I need a AF Slr, I will paid for it with 43MM F1.9. ( I have using a nikon FG and contax T3 )
wlachan 網路會員	59) 2004/03/05 07:26 >要創新? MINOLTA啦，創新到你唔信 I suppose the real reason is that Canon has had USM & IS for quite some time. Both are useful technologies. Being innovative is one thing, but the end products must be practical and useful. And Canon got the right vision when they designed the EOS "system". >點解canon人咁鍾意錐求550EX? 真係會成日用? I am not familiar with Canon flashes, but high end flashes often have variable manual output which is essential for well balanced exposure imho. This is one feature mid-low end flashes cannot achieve (but I do hope they exist because I prefer to carry smaller flash). >用手動機的人多數都唔"興"、唔鍾意用閃燈的 I am not sure I agree with this. Flash is part of photography, and unavoidable in some situations. It is not whether like it or not, but essential sometimes. Just like filters, some filters are useful. >希望pentax出部正過MZ-3嫁啦 I believe they considered MZ-S is the upgrade of MZ-3.
news00 網路會員	60) 2004/03/05 10:46 "POWER ZOOM我未用過，但係都想像得到實用性超低，試問你一百張相之中有幾多張係用會到拉爆?" Although this function is not accepted by most P users, I am quite happy with it. It really help me to take quicker shots. This is my subjective view. "玩PENTAX係因為佢Ｄ鏡, 唔係佢既機身." Yes, I need a user friendly with all neccessary functions body only.