網路會員
|
我都覺得轉N / C 好d,當然,買一部$5000相機,吾代表可以拍出$5000價值,但P好似就到..(X.x),而且D 鏡好貴,有D講咩[平價]SMC,你見到都驚呀.... |
網路會員
|
MZ-S基本上唔可以算係MZ-3既後繼,因為價錢上唔係同級,外形上設計亦有好大分歧~ MZ-3玩古典,MZ-S玩高科技、人體力學 |
網路會員
|
Unfortunately, the sale volume of high end Pentax lenses is much lower than C/N lenses worldwide. For that reason Pentax would never be able to compete on prices. |
網路會員
|
>外形上設計亦有好大分歧~
Quite true. Many were expecting a retro design metal camera, but instead, Pentax put out something completely different. The MZ-S has never been a great seller, just like all other high end Pentax in the past. |
網路會員
|
PENTAX MZ-S 外形太太太創新,好多人接受唔到~~~ 後面仲係"瀉駁",據講呢度就係人體力學既精髓所在 |
網路會員
|
>據講呢度就係人體力學既精髓所在
So they said <g>. But really, speaking of 創新, I think the Z-1/Z-1p is the most innovative design from Pentax. So few buttons and dials, almost everything is hidden without reading manuals. Too bad they cut corners and did not make them attractive enough products. |