網路會員
|
與其屈就，不如一次到位，
錢唔夠，就儲多少少。
寧願一件一件買,唔好為了預算而買cheap野。
機身:33V (梗係買較新型號啦)
鏡頭:EF24-85 F/3.5-4.5 (有24widｅ，唔貴）
EF70-200 F/4L (既然有預算,梗係買呢支啦)
閃燈遲D再買啦! |
網路會員
|
用成皮野都冇邊件係你心頭好.遲早又出又入.唉!
用開pentax mz-50何不買支二手f70-210/4-5.6才hkd700~900.
再加支加支fa24-90都唔洗五千.
認為body唔pro．再用五千元差不多夠買部mz-s了.其實mz-6/7都夠用了． |
網路會員
|
與其屈就，不如一次到位，
錢唔夠，就儲多少少。
寧願一件一件買,唔好為了預算而買cheap野。
機身:33V (梗係買較新型號啦)
鏡頭:EF24-85 F/3.5-4.5 (有24widｅ，唔貴）
EF70-200 F/4L (既然有預算,梗係買呢支啦)
閃燈遲D再買啦!
-------------------------------------------
其實budget預$10000內可能係蚊少少，不過而家已經唔係凈係儲錢．．．而係有
錢都未必可以玩到盡，因為屋企人知道實．．．(當然你都講得冇錯，因為一件
一件咁買返來，冇咁覺眼比佢地見到既 XDDDDDDD )，而且仲要儲錢學車．．
你既建議的確唔錯，我會再考慮下啦，多謝晒先:)不過對我來講wide鏡28已經有
餘，或者會改要EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM(好似平少少，冇法啦．．平幾
百返工已經可以食少幾餐杯麵)，唔知質素會唔會差少少？
另外閃燈最好快d買左先．．因為好多時都覺得唔夠用，不過真係爆budget都要
暫且放棄；而且渣小閃白雖然有質感，不過唔夠長(得200mm..影車影人像ok，不
過遠距影function就蚊d lu，一係等有錢再加多個增倍，一係要去到>200mm咁長
時拎返套舊機舊鏡用:P)
再一次多謝D76 兄指教:) |
網路會員
|
用成皮野都冇邊件係你心頭好.遲早又出又入.唉!
用開pentax mz-50何不買支二手f70-210/4-5.6才hkd700~900.
再加支加支fa24-90都唔洗五千.
認為body唔pro．再用五千元差不多夠買部mz-s了.其實mz-6/7都夠用了．
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
其實呢個問題都掙扎左好耐，當然而家都仲有類似念頭．其實身邊朋友甚至巴士
迷界都係用canon，當初諗住自己一個用Pextax夠晒獨特出眾 XDDD．．點知日子
耐左先發現跟大隊好似著數d，要問人借野或者借比人都好似方便d，而且pextax
既配件好似貴過Canon同Nikon兩大牌子好多，下下要買要換都好溶，所以先諗住
一次過換系統．．．
講到呢度，不如比個問題請教下大家，假設都係預$10000啦，要upgrade成套裝
備，base on返換Canon或者用返Pentax系統，約包含28-300mm呢個焦距加多支外
閃，大家會點揀點砌XDDDD
歡迎繼續指教呢，謝謝 :D |
網路會員
|
機身幾pro都係假, 用入門鏡頭好不到那裡.
|
網路會員
|
if you are really interested in film photography, sooner or later you may have more than 1 camera bodies.
I suggest to invest more on lenses as much as possible. You can choose a higher grade body after you have a reasonable collections of lenses. For example, try thinking a standard zoon plus prime wide/super wide angle and prime tele if your burget are tight.
Price of 70-200L are enough of several prime lenses already.
|
網路會員
|
機身幾pro都係假, 用入門鏡頭好不到那裡.
--------------------------------------
呢樣當然啦，不過都係個句，錢問題啦，而家換系統諗住換個pro過而家部少少
既機身係因為之前部已經係入門機，但冇理由換過部又入門機身0卦
(300,300V,3000V,88,66,定888好 XD)，至於鏡頭．．而家暫且只係諗住影到清
楚對焦唔會太慢既鏡，最理想當然係先一支靚少少既加多支普通少少既．．之後
先再敗上去，所以應該都會考慮下上面D76兄既提議(當然．．對大家來講小小白
都未必係一支靚鏡，但以佢既質素同對焦速度對我來說已經好夠同算propro地) |
網路會員
|
提議以下配置:
Canon EOS33V
EF28-105 USM II 其實，千多銀一支標準變焦，未複何求？
EF100-300mm F4.5-5.6 USM 二千一銀到，又平素質又唔差，當然無得跟白鏡比。
550EX 閃燈，呢樣野都係一步到位好，如果唔係，真係會成日心思思。
再加埋 EF50 f1.8 ，都重有幾百銀比你買埋平腳架。 |
網路會員
|
你本身個計劃都幾好， EOS 30/33的確可以用好耐都唔駛upgrade，個人認為唔駛買眼控。
開始我覺得眼控都只係加300蚊好似冇乜所謂，買左之後真係用唔番300蚊就覺得唔扺，應該慳番買菲林。
我都係用 EF28-105 USM II ，平得黎都質素唔差，係放好大先會矇，不過用完28之後你會覺得成日都唔夠 wide，如果係諗住買小小白(我都有)，最好最好係買24-85：
１）28-105在焦距上重覆比較多，如果你在影 70-105，你會用平鏡影嗎？
２）24-85同小小白個filter size係一樣，可以大家share filter用，平好好好好多，計計埋埋share filter可以平番(買少)五百蚊架！！
閃燈就有錢先買，未必成日有用（當然好睇個人需要）。 |
網路會員
|
買鏡不如考慮下 1) Tamron 28-75/2.8 ($2850) + 2) Canon 70-200/4 L ($5300) 啦. 大家都係 67mm filter. 個 range 又岩. 支 Tamron 一定好過支 Canon 28-105 (我有過, 賣左, f/4 時暗角好明顯!). |
網路會員
|
Are you having nothing now? or you want to switch brands?
Think deeply before you decide to switch brands. |
論壇版主
|
"約包含28-300mm呢個焦距"
不要這樣啦...$10000要28-300,好得去邊...不如買支標準鏡先(變/定)
看你要影什麼啦 |
網路會員
|
買鏡不如考慮下 1) Tamron 28-75/2.8 ($2850) + 2) Canon 70-200/4 L ($5300) 啦. 大家都係 67mm filter. 個 range 又岩. 支 Tamron 一定好過支 Canon 28-105 (我有過, 賣左, f/4 時暗角好明顯!).
--------------------------------------------------
$2850+$5300=8150．．建議本身唔錯，不過．．．$10000-$8150=$1850，咁咪唔駛要body．． XDDD
Are you having nothing now? or you want to switch brands?
Think deeply before you decide to switch brands.
--------------------------------------------------
其實想轉系統係真既，當然套pentax亦唔會丟或者賣(套野比我操得咁殘，送都
未必有人要啦)，會留返來備用，其實pentax係好用，不過個人覺得應該Canon或
者會適合自己用多d，至少原廠同副廠配件普遍都又平又多選擇，加上大隊效
應．．或者應該後悔當年買機比人"乙水"左買Pentax而冇買Canon(好記得當初買
機一心係想要EOS300定500的．．點知．．算吧，年少無知．．)
不要這樣啦...$10000要28-300,好得去邊...不如買支標準鏡先(變/定)
看你要影什麼啦
-------------------------------------------------
天使兄，冇辦法啦，以我而家既情況來講一般標準鏡一定唔夠用，先唔理鏡頭質
素，我而家用中距至長距(約70-300mm)多過用廣角至中距(約28-80)，但又唔可
以完全唔用廣角至中距(影風景，合照，生活照，影車身廣告側面)．．冇計，人
生從來都係充滿矛盾．
而Moon in Water同year1997兄既提議都唔錯，我都會考慮下，不過你地講野會
同我朋友0岩0岩相反，佢地買左33之後(可能因為佢地都係近視而覺得Eye
Control冇用０卦)，都係話要33不如要30，價錢都係差少少，真係唔知點
揀．．:)
在此多謝各位高人對小弟作出詳盡指教同分析，仍歡迎各位繼續指教:D |
網路會員
|
I am a little bit difference.
For 135, I have a large system of Canon FD stuffs (old and manual focus system).
However, I choose Pentax when I want to add a AF 135 system eventhough I need to buy more flash stuffs. (if I choose EOS, I need not spend any more money on flash).
Pentax is just lack of good tele zoom. However, I shoot with 17mm to 135mm, 99% of my time. |
網路會員
|
3asv71, What pentax lens you own now ???
If you consider Tamron or sigma Lens, why don"t you buy a tamron lens with pentax mount ???
if your Mz-50 can use manual lens, just pick up a 2nd hand 50MM F1.4 for under $500 at tst
can you tell us what you need for your slr, and what you lack on your pentax slr.
|
網路會員
|
I shoot with 17mm to 135mm, 99% of my time. <--Agree~!!!
135mm以上既真係好少用
不如留番多D$$$,買o在Canon EOS33V + EF28-105 USM II 先啦~
其他有須要先加~
遲D你會發現你真正需要D乜...
可能係17-40,可能係定焦大光圈,又可能係70-200,RIGHT?
|
網路會員
|
Unless I know I surely need a very long tele, my daily pack for 135film photography are as follow
1) 20-35, 50, 135, 2x
2) 20-35, 50, 85, 2x
3) 17, 35, 50, 135, 2x.
or
4) just 20-35.
2x are mainly for macro but not for more focal length. |
網路會員
|
am a little bit difference.
For 135, I have a large system of Canon FD stuffs (old and manual focus system).
However, I choose Pentax when I want to add a AF 135 system eventhough I need to buy more flash stuffs. (if I choose EOS, I need not spend any more money on flash).
Pentax is just lack of good tele zoom. However, I shoot with 17mm to 135mm, 99% of my time.
----------------------------------------------------------
3asv71, What pentax lens you own now ???
If you consider Tamron or sigma Lens, why don"t you buy a tamron lens with pentax mount ???
if your Mz-50 can use manual lens, just pick up a 2nd hand 50MM F1.4 for under $500 at tst
can you tell us what you need for your slr, and what you lack on your pentax slr.
-----------------------------------------
咁又等我再講多d啦．．
我有一支用左半年左右既Tamron 70-300 ｆ4-5.6 LD macro,一支問人借既
Vivtar28-210(呢支真係有等於冇),一支cosina 100-300 F5.6-6.7同迷一支已經
散左既Sigma 28-80 (:P)，用左pentax三年竟然一支原廠鏡都冇，不過前排見旺
角某店有支28-80賣緊，就算換唔換canon機都有興趣買返支黎用
我諗我影相習慣同唔少人都好唔同，我超過一半以上機會都係用70mm以上(通常
去到200mm內，距離遠d就要再長d）既焦距，多數要黎影半身相,人像相,舞台相,
明星function相,0係街影巴士同車等等,同玩marco等等，而70mm以下主要要來影
巴士同其他交通工具內籠設施,側影車身廣告戶外廣告，一般生活相,合照,風景
相，所以兩者相比之下長焦距鏡對我來講會重要些少，但同時標準鏡又似乎唔可
以缺少，真係矛盾－ˍ－
又要繼續麻煩大家指教了，真不好意思呢 |
網路會員
|
if i were you, I will buy pentax prime lenses.
$10000 can buy alots of good lenses in pentax. you just need to order and wait for a few weeks.
and there are lots of good 2nd pentax lenses on ebay.
However, you are not me. |
論壇版主
|
"However, you are not me."
Yes...
>.< |
