網路會員
|
攝影這東西原本就包括了真實;同時也產生了虛假！
photojournalism 可以盡信嗎？
|
網路會員
|
攝影可以係生意。
攝影可以興趣。
攝影可以創作。
攝影可以.......
各自有其身價； |
新進會員
|
怎麼了怎麼了
大家都吵得面紅耳赤了
我不認為lomo是藝術
藝術作品，是需要長時間的努力和作者注入的思想
lomo，只是visual record
visual record 不需要 creativity
creativity 不等如 dun think just shoot
而lomo亦不只得dun think just shoot
如果大家爭論lomo的好壞時，卻沒有對lomo作了解
我想我們爭論的方向亦會有所不同
而且，用lomo拍攝的人，不等如他們真的如此dun think just shoot
不想討論lomographsociety如何賺錢
lomo的相機缺點其多
亦因為如此
相片的質素常常帶給人驚喜
而帶出來的精神大概是
do it in another way
至於怎樣用lomo的相機do it in another way
就沒有一定的方法
沒有人說用lomo影相就要dun think just shoot
以下是10 golden rules of lomograph:
1.take your camera everywhere you go
2.use it any time - day an night
3.lomography is not an interference in your life but part of it
4.try to shot from the hip
5.approach the objects of your lomographic desire as close as possible
6.dun think
7.be fast
8.you don"t have to know beforehand what you captured on film
9.afterward either
10.dun worry about any rules
我最喜歡的不是dun think just shoot
而是"dun worry about any rules"
如果你把lomo標籤作dun think just shoot
對不起，你錯了
所以有些美麗的lomograph，不只是撞彩那麼簡單 |
網路會員
|
身價補充:
試試用少少哲學性去解釋個問題
物我我們的關聯, 有必要先去確認是"形而上" 還是"形而下". 比如一種創作媒體, 其指向是否出於以"消費"掛帥, 還是已"精神"掛帥.
比如我喜歡 Vincent Van Gogh 畫的向日葵, 我感受到Van Gogh用生命的堅持/熱情去創作這圖畫, 可以是"形而上" .
相反, 我喜歡 Vincent Van Gogh 畫的向日葵, 是因為它是當今世界上最昂貴的畫, 以一種"消費/金錢"的價值去否定其物我的本質, 是"形而下"的, 亦是我們人類對"物"普遍的看法.
所以, 就算一種"物", 除"物"的本質以及其創作者的本質是不變外, 當由第三者與這件"物"有關聯時, 其價值便會因我們的理由而改變.
故物我於第三者而言是存在絕對的主觀性.
主觀/客觀問題.
相信大眾的意識形態, 與及堅持自己的理念好了. |
網路會員
|
Woo, there is a real representative of Lomo that can say someone in the world is very wrong about Lomo.
My understanding of Lomo is like "don"t think, just shoot". It may not be the only truth, but it is a written rule(s) of Lomography.
Photojournalism is not absolutely tell the truth. But it is the way they are doing "mainly".
|
網路會員
|
>6.dun think
>8.you don"t have to know beforehand what you captured on film
>9.afterward either
what is the different between the above three rules to "don"t think, just shoot"?
|
網路會員
|
>6.dun think
>8.you don"t have to know beforehand what you captured on film
>9.afterward either
Do we still need to put in film into the camera? |
網路會員
|
But, when you see the rule ten, you will find that what is Lomography.
To me, it is just a joke to build thoes rules, and it fool all the fellows.
|
網路會員
|
冷靜冷靜 |
網路會員
|
OK, cool down, need beer, a box of Guinness work best for me.
In what I read in Lomography are nothing really serious, but there
are quite a sum at here who is serious enough to protect Lomography.
This is HK, a real 乜人都有既香港....
|
網路會員
|
dun worry about any rules?
o甘,wor唔worry尼條rule好尼?
wor既話,就自打屁屁;
唔worry既話,其實就abide左尼條rule.
我講緊咩呢吓 @_@?
>>Do we still need to put in film into the camera?
dun worry!
|
網路會員
|
a box of Guinness work best for me.
>guinness正丫，飲落有d苦但好香，but好易飽，我一支都飲唔曬，你點飲一箱=_=?
lomo即是靠直覺，某程度上泥講即係無x無束見野就影，亦都冇限定既構圖，總之唔須要諗，舉機即拍 |
網路會員
|
我本身都唔中意lomo,但希望盡量唔好咁公開批評人地
費事嘈交啦
^^
冷靜
|
論壇版主
|
kcy_kwok:
Gum你點看ＶＶＧ啊 |
網路會員
|
>guinness正丫，飲落有d苦但好香，but好易飽，我一支都飲唔曬，你點飲一箱=_=?
In general, I drink 3~5 bottles (500cc/640cc) per night if I don"t eat anything after lunch.
Anyone is free to shot no matter using finder, LCD of just off finder. But, we still need quite a sum of thinking before doing that. Just like what is the best time to shoot, which method to hide camera, how to arrange myself inside the theme, etc. Only mechine doing things with out AI, I hope Lomography is not playing the shutter button. But then, it is still fun if one just treat pressing the shutter button like playing Space Invadar.
|
網路會員
|
我飲果支係330ml的=_=
飲咁多小心肥到唔郁得 |
網路會員
|
肥好呀.....
唔郁得, 我揹45行山影相你又Ｇ唔Ｇ.....
|
網路會員
|
題外話:黑啤會飲飽咩?好耐前,試過一口.....
cool down....唔該兩杯大生啤,再來威士忌加冰....鬆晒 ^^ |
新進會員
|
其實身邊有很多玩正統攝影的朋友也是有玩LOMO的﹐
到底LOMO跟正統攝影是否真的水火不容及充滿芧盾﹖﹖﹖﹖
說到這裡實在是有一個問題問問大家﹐
到底大家的攝影動機是甚麼﹖ |
網路會員
|
自己同自己講。唔使睇。 |
