|
網路會員
|
打錯字: 司法程序.. |
網路會員
|
打錯字，分別不大 |
網路會員
|
我認為任何人都可以法庭為最終審裁, 是否濫用就好難講, 民市法庭往往出現超愈一年的官司, 這又是否濫用? 我反而好憎政府入誅縮短上訴期限, 呢樣真係贏左唔比人上訴, 以時間封殺敗方的既有權利.
真金不怕紅爐火, 我認為正苦如有良夠資詢及立法基礎之後才上市, 今次官司絕對打不入. 本沒倒置講市民引申法律程度就是濫用公帑, 於理不合.
|
網路會員
|
房委會要搞私有化,都唔係今日既事啦,
係到要搞到上市先玩打官司,嘈都早d丫,last minute先玩
政棍就乘機搞事...乞人憎.. |
網路會員
|
上市最後一刻先入紙戰領匯上市,搞突襲，有了判決後,竟然「無法和當事人聯繫」?簡直令人匪夷所思....咦,一點幾又浦頭上訴,Timing幾好丫 |
網路會員
|
想一想, 領匯唔出招股書又點知佢賣Ｄ咩, 又點知佢囉Ｄ錢點發展.
只知佢會上市係唔足以告佢既, 律師都要睇有冇對住客或租戶構成
損失, 要講係最尾尾先起飛腳, 似乎對法律程序唔多清楚, 建議問
問律師唔好靠估.
|
網路會員
|
"想一想, 領匯唔出招股書又點知佢賣Ｄ咩, 又點知佢囉Ｄ錢點發展.
只知佢會上市係唔足以告佢既, 律師都要睇有冇對住客或租戶構成
損失, 要講係最尾尾先起飛腳, 似乎對法律程序唔多清楚, 建議問
問律師唔好靠估."
Agree.
I also want to know if Link REIT complies with the law though I has also applied for it (I am not a living in any kinds of government housing).
真金不怕紅爐火, 我認為正苦如有良夠資詢及立法基礎之後才上市, 今次官司絕對打不入.
After 1997, the Government always says that they will use businees style to work. With this, they have not followed the established guidelines and procedures. We have the "So Ma Kong", "Wai Kong Wu", "Sai Gul", etc. Although I don"t consider that all these guidelines and procedures are completely right, we must not throw all of them away like rubbish.
|
網路會員
|
真金係不怕紅爐火,不過政棍為博知名度搞單咁既野大家又有冇得益?我淨係知班大狀今次又收唔少fee,邊個俾錢先?係咪即係鼓勵大家有野唔妥政府就可以引用公眾利益為理由搞訴訟?如果係咁我諗香港好快就亂過66年暴動果陣。英國佬管左我地咁耐又唔見咁多人話要告政府。 |
網路會員
|
Gowest, 亂過66年就冇可能, 正如你講訴訟要大量金錢, 基本上正苦或權貴已經贏左九成, 仲要係你諗緊上訴與否時入稟要度縮短上訴期, 邊個玩正治及法律, 盲既都睇到! |
網路會員
|
<<領匯唔出招股書又點知佢賣Ｄ咩, 又點知佢囉Ｄ錢點發展.>>
你信唔信兩個老人家睇完本厚過枕頭既招股書先諗住告, 要由兩個老人家出來, 個班莫後黑手都算拿渣.
但今次將上訴限期縮短至一個不合理既時限, 包銷商又話要將上市告吹. 呢個手法亦不光明, 只會招人話柄. 呢種你不仁, 我不義的做法真係唔可以開先例.
|
網路會員
|
而家唔係果兩個老人家或者係大班有冇睇招股書, 係班律師要睇呀!
大哥們, 打官司都係要根據上市招股書內容而肉搏, 而家唔係周猩猩審死官呀, 你當打官司係吹水亂UP24?!
|
網路會員
|
誰人有道理? 誰人為香港好? 誰人不顧全大局? 誰人無風起浪?
大家心里有數.
原本可以開開心心分享政府(商場停車場)的收成.
而家隨時一上市即....
生活在香港, 當然想香港好,
見到有人搞事, 令人不憤.
|
網路會員
|
>誰人有道理? 誰人為香港好? 誰人不顧全大局? 誰人無風起浪?
That much depends on which side of the fence you are. |
網路會員
|
正苦今次係利用左好多人上左艇嘅心態！艇上有大把人做支援，效果好成功，
黎一招大石壓死蟹！點知臨門一腳，不過只係少少阻擠，隻死蟹敢細隻，遲早都Win。 |
網路會員
|
車。美國/台灣總統大選結果都上法庭解決啦。
香港政府資產私有化上市要打官司。小巫見大巫。
法治社會。法律面前人人平等。運用司法情程序解決law。全世界打官司都要花錢啦!! (在大陸都要架,不過係洗黑錢去買通....)
至於果d象牙塔金融經濟學者,真白痴....話怕會影響國際金融中地心地位。佢地真係低低地...咁都up得出。 |
網路會員
|
AFAIK, they are fellowing proper legal procedure, I think its not for us to blame the guys.
Ultimately our Government had themselves to blame, when you think about it, FOA, why do 房委會 need to sold off their assets, well becasue they cannot continue without enough income and why do they have not enough income, simply because the government, without any prior notice and withour much just, stop the home ownership scheme.
In the end, these kind of things will happen more and more, as out government had not yet learn to face the fact that there are just limited public resource and there are just too many people do not agree to the way the management been handling those resource ( right or wrong, is up to you, but I respect their right to question and to challenge )
Ultimately if the government remain as closed and operate in such Black manner, there will always be this kind of Incident coming around -
|
網路會員
|
"誰人有道理? 誰人為香港好?"
Mr. Tung, Man Kin Lun, Mr. Lee, Mr. Kwok, Mr. Cheng, Mr. Tin, Mr. Chan KC, etc. They are the best leaders in the world. I love them all from my soul. OK la.
"誰人不顧全大局? 誰人無風起浪?"
All the people who have any noise on them. We should throw them into rubbish bin for recycling. OK ma.
"原本可以開開心心分享政府(商場停車場)的收成.
而家隨時一上市即...."
Before these noise, you can"t have any shares.
|
網路會員
|
美國同臺灣選總統都要打官司,最後咪一樣改變唔到個結果,一大筆訴訟費就咁花左去。依家亞蟬又話要上訴但係法援都唔啋佢自己人都唔到咁即係點?係咪玩野?冇錢就唔好學人打啦,你話法治社會冇錯但係法治唔通唔駛俾錢?你尊重成個制度就唔好死唔認輸又話乜野對你唔公平咁係咪要亞蟬你贏左先叫公平?再講你上訴d乜野先?商舖做生意同泊車都要政府(納稅人)津貼?有冇搞錯?
點解要停賣居屋?因為同私人市場重疊就係咁簡單!一本通書唔可以睇到老都要因時制宜,你要買樓依家都有好多一二手樓俾你揀唔駛一百萬。姑勿論政府做得有幾差,但我覺得政府已經好努力去除港英時代遺留下來既爛攤子,當中一定有唔少阻力來自社會各階層。唔起居屋咪用其他形式資助囉,但如果自己有能力又係咪要伸大手版問政府先?好多公屋富户依家仲享受緊納稅人資助咁又點?係咪要告佢地? |
網路會員
|
"美國同臺灣選總統都要打官司,最後咪一樣改變唔到個結果,一大筆訴訟費就咁花左去。依家亞蟬又話要上訴但係法援都唔啋佢自己人都唔到咁即係點?係咪玩野?冇錢就唔好學人打啦,你話法治社會冇錯但係法治唔通唔駛俾錢?你尊重成個制度就唔好死唔認輸又話乜野對你唔公平咁係咪要亞蟬你贏左先叫公平?再講你上訴d乜野先?商舖做生意同泊車都要政府(納稅人)津貼?有冇搞錯?
點解要停賣居屋?因為同私人市場重疊就係咁簡單!一本通書唔可以睇到老都要因時制宜,你要買樓依家都有好多一二手樓俾你揀唔駛一百萬。姑勿論政府做得有幾差,但我覺得政府已經好努力去除港英時代遺留下來既爛攤子,當中一定有唔少阻力來自社會各階層。唔起居屋咪用其他形式資助囉,但如果自己有能力又係咪要伸大手版問政府先?好多公屋富依家仲享受緊納稅人資助咁又點?係咪要告佢地?"
Send those outclass that raise noise to hell. They should not have human rights. As they have no money and some of them are living by "Chung Wu". They should be treated like pigs & cows. They should have not allowed to vote. All people with asset less than 10 millions should not allowed to vote and say. No no no, should be 1 billion.
Long lives Mr. Tung, Man Kin Lun, Mr. Lees, Mr. Kwok, Mr. Cheng, Mr. Tin, Mr. Chan KC, etc. They have removed a lot of 港英時代遺留下來既爛攤子. Our Mr. Tung has done a lot to conmbine the 居屋 and 私人市場. You should appreciate the 85000 policy. Mr. Tung wisely clear that 港英時代遺留下來既 bomb. If not by him, when the bomb explode, you all have nothing.
No outclass should be given a chance to raise any noise. Their money should be ours as they are non productive.
I am a die hard fans of our great leaders and GW. Thank you for their efforts in changing Hong Kong from a World city to a World Asia city.
|
網路會員
|
<<而家唔係果兩個老人家或者係大班有冇睇招股書, 係班律師要睇呀!>>
我唔知你無打過官司, 定係你睇得電視多, 以為d 律師會主動同你四周維搵證據, 會幫你好仔細睇下邊樣可唔可以告, 除非你係個d 大粒佬, 有大把錢叫佢幫你打官司個隻.
我老細就試過, 搵我同個律師傾, 因為個project 係由我跟開, 之前個秘書已經將幾個box file 變成一個, 點知去到仲要同佢慢慢搵邊d 野先最有用, 我開始好嬲, d 野已經draft 晒比佢, 睇完會好清楚, 仲搵咩呀, 我諗緊佢有係無睇過份野既時候, 佢同我地講話一定要睇左最重要個幾點證據, 睇下有無得打, 如果有又或者就算無都堅持要打, 先至再detail 睇了解成件case, 如果要睇晒d資料先決定, 只會浪費錢同時間.
呢件case, 如果事前無其他實質證據, 只係本招股書係最後關鍵, 根本打贏機會好細, 仲建議兩個老人家去打官司, 而且兩個老人家仲無法援, 根本就係不負責任.
|
|
|
