新進會員
|
個人覺得用400度會比較有彈性。加上富士的400度菲林已做得好靚, 而且又平。如果你付擔得起, 就買富士的NPH400吧, 一定不會令你失望。 |
新進會員
|
NPH400!! excellent 400 film!!! |
新進會員
|
個人意見都係用400度吧，起碼靈活性大點，如要求不高用Fuji X-TRA 400其實微粒的粗幼程度已經可以，記住不要用柯達400就好了，比富士的粗很多．． |
論壇版主
|
Agree with 3asv71, Use Fuji 400...
NPH is expensive, 要看那淡色調是否適合你拍攝主題了,微粒倒真是很幼
I recommand bring Fuji 100 and 400 at same time.
|
新進會員
|
"記住不要用柯達400就好了，比富士的粗很多．．"
Yes!! |
新進會員
|
多謝大家意見!
Fuji X-TRA 400 & NPH400,若沖8R,可接受嗎?
My home page
www.calvincheung.com |
論壇版主
|
Must see other facts.
You lens quality...
Do you use tripod when shooting...
Do you stop down the aperture...etc |
新進會員
|
the grain size of NPH400 is much smaller than XTRA 400! |
新進會員
|
手持拍攝:
xtra400全天候;100度好好天氣才用...
帶腳架:
怕微粒粗,那麼要帶腳架,任何時候配100度都無問啦! |
新進會員
|
but 淡色d喎 |
新進會員
|
NPH was specifically designed for portrait. For 旅行, XTRA400 is more suitable imho. Both can do nice 8R. |
新進會員
|
那麼200度呢? |
新進會員
|
using ISO 400, you can have more flexibility
ok if most cases indoor |
新進會員
|
"NPH was specifically designed for portrait"
Do you mean that it is red-toned? |
論壇版主
|
No, unlike Konica Impressa, NPH is "Grey" tone...淡色 |
新進會員
|
個人不會用200度菲林的, 微粒粗了很多 (對比起100度來說), 但又不是快了很多, 一不造二不休, 一係100, 一係400
nph400真係好好, 但菲林一蚊一格, 仲未計沖曬費...
仲有, 你去邊度旅行?? 去不同地方旅行很影响你可作的攝影裝備, 直接影响你用甚麼菲林... |
新進會員
|
"NPH is "Grey" tone...淡色"
Is it 原色? |
新進會員
|
"nph400真係好好, 但菲林一蚊一格, 仲未計沖曬費..."
Use slide could be cheaper |
新進會員
|
yes, forget about 200 la.
200, when compared with 100, only gives you one more
shutter stop. If 100 is not fast enough, 200 can"t help either.
|
新進會員
|
帝國天使兄:用腳架可減細微粒?
3asv71兄:400的確大點,但放8x10大相時會不會微粒過粗?
Must see other facts.
You lens quality...
Do you use tripod when shooting...
Do you stop down the aperture...etc
個人意見都係用400度吧，起碼靈活性大點 |
