新進會員
|
I think most people are too concern about the specification. |
新進會員
|
業界最常拿作比較級數的是基本閃光燈同步速度, 和最高快門速度.
Minolta 700si 的 1/200s, 1/8000s, 和當時的Canon EOS 5 是一樣的. |
部落格(1)
新進會員
|
canon機身換電要除手柄,早在new f-1年代已經有此bug, 是canon傳統, 笑爆咀.
********************************************************************
Nikon F4s換電都要除手柄...
|
新進會員
|
"真係比你吹漲!咁你唔通用700si比eos5呀!"
點解700si唔係同eos5比呀???兩者根本係同級機種,你用過700si未呀究竟!!!
|
新進會員
|
=> 真係比你吹漲!咁你唔通用700si比eos5呀!"
點解700si唔係同eos5比呀???兩者根本係同級機種,你用過700si未呀究竟!!!
無可否認超人玩攝影或對SLR 的經驗比較多.
但是小弟已經用了700si 已經有一年多, 現在小弟也是把它作為主力SLR.
雖然不算太精通, 但是它如何使用它和有甚麼基本功能小弟會知道.
但是攝影還是用心機比較好. 相機只是工具.
對我來說Minolta Dynax 700si 已經滿足我的攝影需要.
如有錯誤之處, 請原諒.
還是我說到這裡, 免得說錯又受圍剿.
|
新進會員
|
唔同eos5比係因為eos5有innovative既發明(eye focus),
須然未係完善, 但回看700si, 很平凡, 沒甚麼突出功能.
|
新進會員
|
唔同eos5比係因為eos5有innovative既發明(eye focus),
須然未係完善, 但回看700si, 很平凡, 沒甚麼突出功能
Do you know Minolta has eye start?
But still Dynax 700si is a prosumer SLR simlarly placed as EOS5
|
新進會員
|
各位好像忘記700si是第一架相機加上5400HS後有高速閃燈同步快門的（１∕８０００Ｓ），是否特別，是否INNOVATIVE呢？ |
新進會員
|
According to the history of Minolta AF system, "7" is positioned as high end amateur model (while "9", "5" & "3" are pro, mid & low end models respectively), which is roughly the same as Canon EOS 5, Nikon F801s/F90X, or Pentax Z-5. However, due to their differences in features, it is difficult to be expected completely identical. About the spec, while I have found high flash sync is useful for outdoor daylight fill-flash, but I have never used 1/8000s, and seldom use 1/4000s. 1/2000s is pretty much the fastest I need in practice. |
新進會員
|
"High flash sync" is really an innovative and useful design, but I don"t think that "eye focus" is an innovative design. |
新進會員
|
The high speed flash is innovative enough, but it is all start in Olympus not Minolta.
Eye-start is nothing really innovative as most camera work in very high speed during standby to full working, and the battery saving of eye-start show no advantage at all.
|
新進會員
|
I know that "high flash sync" was first made by Olympus. I just want to say this function is really innovative and useful and the "eye focus" design cannot compare to it. I haven"t said that Minolta is the inventor of "high flash sync". Please don"t over-react. |
新進會員
|
The most innovative design in SLR is the instant return mirror which was designed by Pentax.
|
新進會員
|
You are absolutely right for this point. No point to argue. Pentax is the best because I have used Pentax cameras for more than 18 years. Don"t attack me on this. The above feedback is just for Pentax fans only. |
新進會員
|
I use Pentax 110, 135, 645, 67.
And, Pentax is the 1st company to include a built in TTL flash which is the third most innovative design after AF-SLR. |
新進會員
|
香港至*NET*超人
Despite my high respect for you, you have reacted to this thread far off from being objective. We are talking about 700si here, a camera almost ten years ago. |
新進會員
|
The objective after the sender"s reply was already changed to 700si is great.
|
新進會員
|
700si is not great, it"s only a camera. But that"s FACT, just NO BIAS! |
新進會員
|
Well well well.
At that time there were also F90X and EOS5 and I really don"t know any other model from Pentax. I don"t really consider 700si is a great camera both technically and commercially. Neither is 800si. However, Dynax 7 is. It is the best of all prosumer SLR available in the market, IMHO. |
新進會員
|
我是一個700si五年用家，映了超過五百筒相片.......讓我來說說吧
以1993年尾的科技來說，不經不覺已是十年前的事，700si實在是一部不可多得的相機，她是當年的超級明星(囊括四大相機獎)。除了她對焦速度不算很快外 (其實一般用途是足夠的)，其他的功能一應俱全，1/8000快門，高速閃燈、遙控閃燈.......最重要的是她極之易用的介面......這都是她成功之處，若與EOS-5相比是合理的，正得謂各有千秋，有些部份我覺得比EOS-5的要好，例如用料上，700SI的菲林軌用不銹鋼的，EOS-5的只是膠料.......不過EOS-5的對焦的確比700SI的快，但700SI的測光又是有名的準確........你話點比呢？
我用700SI不知幾操暴，摔倒不知多少次了，有次8號風球是映相，全機濕透，有水漏果隻.......她依然依我在暴風中戰鬥了幾個小時才停下來......我起初都以為她會壯烈....但用風筒吹乾又是一條硬漢.......你話係咁神奇？
以上只是小弟一些感受......
各位 MINOLTA的 FANS，這個世界實在有很多人是不明白MINOLTA的，這不打緊的，我們要有風度，向他們分享我們的感受，聆聽別人的聲音，這才顯得我們這群少數的MINOLTA人可貴.....我們不用恃勢淩人，亦不必妄自菲薄........
攝影的世界，都是多些包容、多些諒解、多些團結好了......
|
