網路會員
|
Sorry, I should say that 金藝 has great potential. You and the shop may need sometime to pick up your taste. If you give garbage to them, they can"t turn it into gold. Be sure!
|
網路會員
|
is it the one at Causeway Bay ? Do you have their details , like $ for 4R and CD $? tel. number ?
Thanks again |
網路會員
|
MongKok: 2783 7087 (金雞廣場,中旅社對面) 4R @ $1/0.8/ ( i am a bit confused, if you take them the other day, it is $0.2 cheaper)
DON"T try their photo print from slide!
Causway: 2808 0892 ( i have tried it)
I have to stop here and will not reply until next night. Because I am doing some important stuffs.
|
網路會員
|
thanks a lot and sorry to disturb you ! |
網路會員
|
唔好O甘講,我話有野做係唔想你等我答你, 同唔想自己做野分心啫.
|
網路會員
|
tata168:
出左相啦. 你想自己睇睇, 定係我響度宣判呢?
|
網路會員
|
dear Arthur,
Please post some pictures here if possible and please comments about them and make jugement. Thank you very much.
tata168 |
網路會員
|
Short comment:
as I say, no need to try it again; these are the worst photos that I ever get both from negatives and slides: unfaithful color tone; limited D-max to reproduce colur, esp in dark region.
1.) I got only 1 (RDP, sun on my back) excellent print out of 8.
2.) For the other 7 photos (side or no sunlight), 3 from RDP3 accpetable. But, the sea is a bit cyan not blue. And green in dark region cannot be reproduced, just look dark. The water in shing mun is also cyan rather than green/pale blue. That is, something wrong with color tone when compared with the sildes and prints from other shops.
3. )The prints from EB-3 tell the full story, esp. the 2 with 6 Blythes sitting next to some flowers on a cloudy day. The prints simply lack the D-max to reproduce the rich colour graduation captured by the carl zeiss lens. The golden hair and the face merged and the different dark green color of different grasses merged as a piece of darkness. The darkness is what "前輩" calls "lone", a patch of blackness. Even worse, there seem a veil on these 2 photos.
4) Low color saturation compared with prints from other shops and lack 3-dimensionality.
So, I guess that your photos look: (1) very pale in light area ,e.g sky and lack details; (2) pure dark/black in dark region. Little cour gradation is shown. Strange colur tone and limited resoultion (veiled). Am I right?
|
網路會員
|
Dear Arthur, Sincerely thank you very much for your comments about the prints from the T.F.S. Sorry, it also waste your money la. Your comments is very clear and professional, I think this time Mr. Fung nothing to say la. Your guess of my pictures from him is correct, all pale (every parts of the picture !) and strange colour tone at all . That"s why I said before his prints is the worst. Not my personal opinion but a professional comments now !
Thanks again . |
網路會員
|
Not really a professional. Just a second opinion.
Originally, I want to show you the pictures and you show me yours so that it is more easy to make a comparison. It is more fair to T.F.C. too. |
網路會員
|
I just can show you some pictures from his CD , would you mind to give me your email address ? Ah, you may take a look to my photo forum in this web, the one with dead fishes ,poor tree and a lady by the sea shore are the picture CD from T.F.S. which I said is not satisfy. |
網路會員
|
The "deadfish" is not bad wor! If you take photo around noon and using high contrast lens from "N", the background is likely to be dark. But I guess the dark green colour in the background was not reproduced appropriately. Do you think so? Does you slide also unable to capture the dark green background?
|
網路會員
|
yes, the dark green even normal green is grey tone.I must say every thing grey. |
網路會員
|
IC, the only excellent picture has no obvious dark green color because the sun was on my back. Anyway, it seems that we come to some consensus and have identify the problems. Hope they will see this thread and get the problems fixed.
Happy New Year everybody!!!
(about poor tree and the lady, sometimes one may get hazy pics near seashore. but yours seem much hazy than mine even mine are including distance objects on the sea. Mine are also taken with RDP3. My conjecture is that they get overly dark scan images so that they lighten the images and results in foggy images. We should stop here.)
|