Lulumi大大何出此言呢? 1DsII的高ISO值優勢不是還在嗎?
依小弟的看法,數位機身高ISO值的好用,不只是在實用上,而且在使用上也是,比方說隨環境調整ISO值,只要隨指而動就可以了,但換成36張一捲的不同ISO值底片,在"使用"上實在也沒有優勢啊~~

期待中...............

觀光客大哥...小弟不"財",從沒實際用過比過大兔子的高ISO有多"高山仰止",只是很單純地就傳統/數位機身的ISO值調整方式來比較,數位機實在是方便很多,對個人來講這是個優勢,比要我去抽換不同ISO值底片來的方便.也許其它前輩熟能生巧,看法也許就不同了.

而且最為顯著的優勢就是科技的成長,底片的發展已經到了高度成熟的階段了,也就是能再苛求的空間不多了,但是感光原件的發展,目前還在以陡峭的斜率爬升中,拿去年的機子跟今年的比,就會發現像素提昇,雜訊降低,所以預期現階段高階機身的某些性能,未來在中階機身出現,應該是合理的想法.

-可能有70%是拿來拍攝工作記錄,20%是對攝影有興趣,9%是靠攝影維生,1%是搞藝術的...
對70%拿相機的人來說,方便,省錢才是重點,底片素質根本不重要,我現在也成了70%的其中一員了..
但很不幸的,相機工業是靠這些不專業的人在賺錢的．-

Very well said, but the fact is while the mass profit exist in that 70% consumer market. The other 30% can substain high profit margin items. So long a product can yield enough of a profit and likely retain or even increase in margin which is what high quality film product are. There exist a business reason for the products.

The firm like Ilford, Lotus, Sinar and etc do not rely on those 70% and they will turn to find a way to the last 10 or 5 % of the market that they can made a profit. Its in the middle ground product like Leica, Hasselblad, and Contax that got really crunched. They cannot exactly be the top and earn those money, but they simply cannot survive in the thin margin and too competetive consumer sector either. And simply the market do not have enough of a price/margin for them.

On the other hand, I think most had to realize that the Digital Photography development will in the coming years stabilize. The past fury is fueled by the market needing/wanting such devices. This 70% of the market had almost saturated, and is likely to be so and from then on its going to be minute incremental improvement and stabilization fo the market ( manufacturing cost goes down and prfofit goes up again allowing Mfr to some degree of business security ).

The truth is Technology of the Sensor had almost come to a point where the return do not warrant the improvement, and physical limit being reached. The next phase will be stabilizing and incremental improvement on the quality of existing sensor. DSLR will have more to grow, but DC is about reaching a point where there's simply no need for drastic imaging improvement in the sensor.

數位單眼的高ISO值確實是非常好用，連動指頭都不必，可以自動調升，根本沒感覺就拍出來了。底片根本不可能做到每張一種感光度吧，至少目前是這樣。會有此種需求的專業人士應該在這樣的情形下也無法再用回底片，除非奈米底片能做到1600甚至3200，而且細緻程度和100一樣，這樣至少可以符合大部分【拍的出影像】的需求，但必要時就要用減光鏡了。

真能在同一捲底片上，前一張感度100，後一張感度1000嗎？那沖洗底片洗成照片時，真的能每張看起來都像是【曝光正常】嗎？不過即使這樣，大概我大部份還是可能續用數位，底片再怎樣都無法立即看結果，除非他還能作拍立得用。

有些統計學上的謬誤(非關這個論題).在商業的統計上.常常99%的使用人口的使用量不及1%使用人口的使用量

這倒很類似著名的80/20法則....80%營收是由20%的人所創造
現在很多人拍數位之後都不洗照片了，相紙也沒因數位而成長
而且數位相機大廠很多，毛利跌的快，她要進來也很拚
柯達要如何定位呢?
純屬猜測，如有雷同，純屬巧合 ^^|||||

假如真的有這種底片，不知道沖洗費會不會不一樣耶~~~
如果變成沖一捲要200...我還是會選擇一般底片吧^^

假如真的有這種底片，不知道沖洗費會不會不一樣耶~~~
如果變成沖一捲要200...我還是會選擇一般底片吧^^
=====================================================

嗯,這也是關鍵性的一環

還有,沖片,放相的設備貴不貴,也很重要