網路會員
|
Wandervoge兄,
請問您的OM-2S/P有什麼問題嗎?因為小弟也有兩台,所以想知道可能會有什麼毛病?
|
網路會員
|
To Palmboy 兄:
謝謝您的經驗分享
啊啊....被發現我是用Kodak HD200菲林，下次我來試試正片效果 ^_^ |
網路會員
| |
網路會員
|
請問這支鏡頭是 OM mount？是否需要加 adapter？價錢與 Zuiko 28/2.8 相差多少呢？ |
網路會員
|
我手上三台om-2sp都一樣，快門動作感覺不若om-1/2/4輕快俐落，反而像canon AE-1P一樣拖泥帶水。聽得很難過.. |
網路會員
|
還好只是快門動作感覺不爽利...^_^
不知有沒有可能因為OM-2SPOT/PROGRAM有"PROGRAM"的原因造成的? |
網路會員
|
Wandervoge兄
應該如collective_9-9兄所言
拿到第一台時我也覺得怪怪
後來手上幾台都一樣 就覺得正常 |
網路會員
|
jerloong兄:
之前承您誏了一顆24mm鏡，
經過這幾次拍攝的心得，
發這顆鏡在最邊緣處有明顯的畫質鬆散的特徵。
但是這顆鏡頭也真是一顆優質鏡!!
小小心得~ |
網路會員
|
所以才會被我冰起來，一來要點測，om-4來得實用，om-2sp只是缺手缺腳的點測，要自動，要otf，om-2/om-2n就很實用了.. |
網路會員
|
To Palmboy兄 :
Carl Zeiss Jena是東德蔡司，這應該是OM Mount的鏡頭，不用外加Adaptor。
只是我查了一下資料，有的說是這是掛東德蔡司商標，實質上是日本製??
所以有點不解，想上來問問各位....
|
網路會員
|
轉貼: http://lists.tako.de/html/Olympus-OM/1999-08/msg00829.htmlA trawl of the archives produced a 1984 issue of Amateur Photographer with a full page advert for "Zeiss Jenazoom Lenses". Quote "Today Zeiss have introduced a range of lenses which they have had maufactured to their specifications in Japan, which incorporates the very finest traditions, the total experience, of over 100 years continuous lens production. Designed to complement virtually every SLR camera manufactured - available for Praktica, Canon, Olympus, Nikon ..." etc. It draws comparisons with the world famous "Tessar" of the 1900s. The sole UK distributors were Carl Zeiss Jena Ltd, the UK arm of the East German Zeiss company. The ad features a "75-300mm f4.5-5.6 MC Macro Jenazoom", with 13 elements in 10 groups, a filter size of 58mm and weighing 690g. It doesn"t mention any others specifically. A dealer ad in the same issue lists the following (prices in UKP) 28mm f2.8 43.95 35-70 f3.5 69.95 35-135 f3.5 139.95 70-210 f4.5 94.95 As a comparison, the same ad lists a Sigma Synchro-II 35-135 f3.5 at the same priceas its Zeiss equivalent. This may or may not be an indication of quality and/or origin :-) |
網路會員
|
http://lists.tako.de/html/Olympus-OM/2004-09/msg00902.htmlFrom: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:28:36 +0000 I"ve got a 28/2.8 Carl Zeiss Jena. It"s a nice little lens, well-made, but not exactly Zuiko class. It was like new when I got it about four years ago, and I"ve been well pleased with it, enough that I haven"t sought a 28mm Zuiko. I shot my Landscape TOPE with it. The mount, like some of the older Tamron Adaptalls, has a screw head in the wrong place for the OM-3 and OM-4 reset button"s health, so I had to epoxy it over. If you get one, you want to watch out for that. Walt |
網路會員
|
繼續找資料 @,@" http://lists.tako.de/html/Olympus-OM/2000-09/msg01563.htmlAt some point during the 1970"s when Carl Zeiss Jena was on the rocks financially, they prostituted their name and reputation on a line of third party lens designs to sell them as aftermarket lenses for other SLR systems. One of them was the Olympus OM system. They are not Carl Zeiss or Carl Zeiss Jena designs. This doesn"t make them bad, but the design formulation lineage does not trace to pre-war Carl Zeiss, or post-war Carl Zeiss Jena designs either. They are just a third-party (non-Zeiss) design with a Carl Zeiss Jena trademark. Don"t be fooled into thinking you are buying a real "Carl Zeiss" lens, or a real "Carl Zeiss Jena" lens, or pay any premium for the name marking. |
網路會員
|
不過發現OM-2SPOT/PROGRAM台灣好像還蠻多台的..呵呵 |
網路會員
|
另外發現小弟改造的MINOLTA EH-7眼罩裝在OM-2SP上是最順最好看的了.
昨天到台北後火車站的太原路,買了幾個直徑16mm的不銹鋼小鐵環給先前的N手相機當背帶環用,雖然比OLYMPUS原廠OM的大,但是還蠻不錯的,而且一個只要新台幣8元.
|
網路會員
| |
網路會員
| |
網路會員
|
嗚嗚....下雨天待家裡看ebay對身心不好....還是帶E-1出門走走好了 |
網路會員
|
請問小弟的 OM-1n 機身海綿老化,變黏黏能清乾淨換新嗎?需多少錢？另小弟想徵一支 50/1.8 or 50/1.4 MC 鏡頭,有人願意割愛嗎?
|
網路會員
|
可以換，也可以自己換..
去要幾個空片殼，把裏面的黑絨布拆下來就是最好的替代品了。
海綿..就用面紙或衛生紙擦吧﹗
50/1.8mc我有，鏡片ok，外觀..好像是裝濾鏡的地方有一點貓，忘了，得找找.. |
