請問各位大大
NC3那理可以買到 價位多少 謝謝
NC3有中文版嗎

D100 + SB800 question.
After some test shots with the SB800 on the D100, it seems to me that the "Balanced Fill Flash" works much better than it did with the SB80DX. Is this my imagination, or was D-TTL "Matrix" upgraded in some way with this flash?

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10417420

I don"t think it"s your imagination. When I upgraded from SB80 to 800 I noticed a definite improvement with my D100. I can"t tell you why. It was just more consistent overall.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10418297

後製:D

Introduction + high ISO D100 pictures (large and long)
Posted by    Patrizio  
I am a very happy D100+MB-D100 user and realized everyday how much digital photography has, in my case, revolutionized the approach towards this wonderful art, offering a multitude of creative opportunities.

Never been touched by the problems of lack of sharpness or noise at high ISO at the formats I usually print, or probably just perceived quality in a cocoon of performances that I personally believed to be already hard to beat.

The following photos were taken at the V&A museum in London last week.

Some areas were so dark it was almost hard to see things with bare eyes while some other rooms offered challenging exposure and DR situations that nevertheless the D100 was able to cope with decently.

I had with me the inexpensive 18-70 and a trusty 50mm f1.8 using the camera almost fully in Auto mode, aperture priority as usual for me and a custom curve I prepared in NC; no flash, high ISO in many instances (640-1250) in a sort of test of what this combination is still able to offer with results that seemed to me still acceptable.

Files have just been rescaled, curves slightly open, very low USM in photoshop (30 to 40 - 1 - 2)


Comments/critique more than welcome,

Patrizio
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=11232937

I didn"t test these as rigorously as previous curves, however, I didn"t need to because they are exact replicas of the previous v3.5 v3.4 curves except for the extreme shoulder end. So all the tests I did for the previous curves apply. I did test them each with approximately 50 or so shots to make sure the histograms matched and the color was not off. I used both flash and no flash to test.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=11242607

Keep in mind these are meant to be compared to EV comp
Posted by    fotogenetic  
When evaluating these curves, keep in mind that they are meant to be an alternative to EV compensation which many people use to correct dark images. Compared to using EV compensation, these curves hold much more highlight information with the same brightness in midtones.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=11245287

Removing Provia Curves
Posted by    fotogenetic  
After doing many comparisons over a period of a year, I"ve concluded that in high contrast situations, no curve can match the color accuracy of the low contrast curve with +0.33 EV permanently set. The Provia curve was an attempt to recreate the low contrast curve with EV compensation, however, I haven"t been able to find the key to imitating that curve. It seems different somehow than all the other curves. I will discontinue the Provia curve from my website and put it in the archive files for those who still find use for it. As for myself, I will be keeping the Point and Shoot curve loaded in my camera for medium to low contrast lighting situations and using low contrast +.33 EV compensation in high contrast lighting. This combination seems to cover most lighting situations well. I will still conduct tests on the Point and Shoot and EV3 curves this week. They are still much better than using EV compensation without any changes in color or inconsistency in contrast.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=11245669

Suggested usage for curves
Posted by fotogenetic
Someone asked me to post this earlier and I"ll probably post it on my website if I have time. In my experience, curves are best used along with the default curves depending on the lighting situation. Here"s my suggested usage:

Outdoors sunny (high contrast):

Best results obtained using low contrast curve with minimal EV compensation if any (+.33 EV at most).

Outdoors overcast (low contrast):

Best results using EV3 or Point and Shoot curves with no EV compensation. Using flash really adds a surreal look to images also.

Indoors flash (medium contrast):

Good results with EV3 or Point and Shoot curves. Low contrast curve with +.33 EV works good too if you"re looking for a softer tonality.

Low light

Best not to use custom tone curves due to possible increase in noise in dark areas. Use default tone curves with EV compensation.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=11247889

對!
正確的說法是"閃燈快門同步的上限"
1/180就是D100的極限了,要上去可以(花點小技巧就行),但保證拍到的東西一定不正確...

>如果我要拍背景全黑的特寫照
改收光圈來減少吃光吧..

>我記得以前那台4500好像可以
DC大多是採鏡間混CCD電子快門的設計,可以全快門速度進行閃燈同步.

您只要機身用的是簾幕快門(不論縱走或橫走,就必然會有閃燈同步的上限),跟是不是SLR無關.
貴與便宜的快門差在同步上限的快與慢而已.
(D100閃燈同步1/180,D1H閃燈同步1/500).

而在實作上,簾幕快門想要突破閃燈同步速度的話.
要借重所謂的高速閃燈模式(FP)
FP這東西在Nikon家族裡只有專業/準專業級機身會有.
D100是沒有滴~