網路會員
|
maybe sharper on edge , but most people I know like 35/2 Pre-A more than 35/2 Asph . |
網路會員
|
Than how about 35/1.4 pre-a in compare with asph? IT seems that the old 35/1.4 is quite soft when wide open.
|
網路會員
|
[Summilux 35mm pre-ASPH and ASPH]
If I weren't wrong, 35mm/f1.4 summilux pre-ASPH is actually a quite old optical formula calculated in the late 50' by Dr. Mandler at Leitz Canada, Midland. While wide open, it exhibits obvious aberration which has some sort of soft-focus effect on the picture. Stopping down to f4 or f5.6 delivers normal sharp images. Many leica connoisseurs love this lens because this special effect while wide open, especially for B&W photography.
Scientifically speaking, the summilux 35mm ASPH calculated in 90' at Leica Germany (Solms) leads the pre-ASPH version with a large gap. IMHO, the summilux 35mm ASPH also serves as a better general-purpose lens and can be used with confidence at f1.4. But when you need the special atmosphere created by the summilux 35mm pre-ASPH, the ASPH version just can't do it.
|
網路會員
|
what about the Summilux 50mm ASPH, is it worth to buy? I know many like the summilux 50mm pre-asph a lot, because not many have tried ASPH. But it seems that ASPH is better than Pre-Asph for general and all purposes. |
網路會員
|
ㄏㄏ
工作用M50/1.4A
抽象柔美用M50/1
放大細節層次50/1.4A遠比50/1.4好多了
尤其光圈全開清晰度差異頗大
如果沒進步...徠卡也不必改款了
只是很多人念舊....愛那個所謂的味道... |
網路會員
|
我愛Lecia就是其細節層次，特別是暗位的表現。Sharpness就不是最大concern了。 |
網路會員
| |
