回論壇首頁
論壇主選單 > 器材版 > 關於 NIKON AF ED 200/F4 MICRO?
作者  
討論話題
 

A-Zhi


網路會員

請問有大大用過這隻鏡頭嗎?拍出來的影相如何呢?

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

1) 2006/02/25 11:09 

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

2) 2006/02/25 11:10 

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

3) 2006/02/25 11:11 

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

4) 2006/02/25 11:12 

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

5) 2006/02/25 11:12 

rrpp


終身 VIP

6) 2006/02/25 13:46 
小弟有一隻
雖然不常拍
但可以提供一些看法給您參考

1.九枚葉片的光圈,背景模糊得很漂亮

2.自動對焦~~~~只有慢

3.M/A切換環和小黑三一樣爛~~~容易斷

4.對綠色很敏感~~~~拍出來很綠

5.拍出來影像很利

6.進行1:1微拍很難手持

7.手動對焦1M~無限遠比較鬆~~~~1M內很緊(可能只有我的會)

小弟之前拍的~~~請指教
http://dgphoto.photosharp.com.tw/DGPHOTO/ViewPublish.aspx?PublishId=36946&page=1&ViewType=Thumb&qid=21&qstr=rrpp&version=0

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

7) 2006/02/26 00:38 
Re: Tamron 180/3.5 Macro vs Nikkor 200/4 Micro

First-The Tamron is not better than the Sigma. I've shot hundreds of slides with each. They are both phenomenal lenses, and handling should be your determinant. If you want to use tc's then the Sigma (180 or 150) may be a better choice. Optically they are even and I spent a lot of time looking. Please don't take this as a knock on Tamron, I think it is a great lens. I've just seen a lot opinions that are not based upon hands on experience and one poor comparison on the web that is often referenced. These are contrary to what I've experienced and what so many other knowledgeable photographers have stated. Sorry...had to vent. Anyway...both great glass.

Second-I think that the Nikkor is worth the extra and I sold my Sigma after I used the Nikkor for a while. I'll try to break down why.

-The bokeh is phenomenal (best I've seen including the Tamron 90..which I like a lot)

-It has the best resolving power and edge-to-edge sharpness that I've seen
-Contrast is better than the other two (and they are VERY good)

-I think all of the above combine to give that special "glow" or "pop" to images taken with this lens

-Handling is a dream. That being said, I almost always manual focus macro shots and the MF throw and damping is perfect. I liked the Tamron, and thought the Sigma was even better, but the Nikkor is the best. If you use AF then the Sigma would be best followed by the Tamron...the Nikkor would be my last choice for AF.

-The tripod collar is perfect! Smooth, low profile, solid.
-Smaller, lighter, easy to hike with.

-Built! The AF/MF ring is a known weakness, but I never use it being in MF all of the time.

Ok, this is all from my actual experience. I am a field nature photographer, so that is my perspective. I don't shoot coins, watch faces, newsprint, brick walls, or anything of that ilk. I have no doubt that there are others who feel differently about things. If they have used all three lenses and have a different opinion, I completely respect that. The reality is that if I spread out a thousand slides and asked which slide came from which lens, only a very few individuals might be able to do it on a limited basis. I do think that the 200MicroAFD is one of those special lenses that I can actually do this with, and even then...not always. All great lenses...the gift of macro...no bad glass

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&message=17210677

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

8) 2006/02/26 02:43 

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

9) 2006/02/26 02:46 

A-Zhi


網路會員

10) 2006/02/26 05:40 
感謝二位大大提供的參考資料及建議
本有考慮其他幾隻微距鏡
但小弟我拍人像實在是末耗咕ㄟ
一個美麗的麻豆
讓小弟我拍起來像一棵文旦
您說這像話嗎?
所以想拍昆蟲及花草似乎好一點
但拿短焦拍昆蟲
那隻蜜蜂拍起來就跟鼻屎一樣大
所以就想問看看 Nikkor 200/4 Micro
各位大大對這支鏡頭的評價如何
是否給他敗下去了
肛溫喔!


lonine


網路會員

11) 2006/02/26 07:08 
希望給你拍的麻豆皮膚好好,要不然給您用200micro拍下去,相片要是給他看到了,那就..........

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

12) 2006/02/26 10:24 

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

13) 2006/02/26 10:28 
但小弟我拍人像實在是末耗咕ㄟ
一個美麗的麻豆
讓小弟我拍起來像一棵文旦
======================
要靠後製磨皮.

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

14) 2006/02/26 10:47 

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

15) 2006/02/26 10:49 

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

16) 2006/02/26 10:57 
或者:
Neat image

http://www.neatimage.com/

j8763617


網路會員

17) 2006/02/26 11:02 
不知NIKON AF ED 200/F4 MICRO與Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM這兩支相比較(銳利度、反差、色澤、對焦速度),何者熟優?

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

18) 2006/02/26 11:03 
PS保留毛孔的磨皮方法之一

http://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=209824

kuankuoyun2002


網路會員

19) 2006/02/26 13:34 

A-Zhi


網路會員

20) 2006/02/28 02:47 
不知NIKON AF ED 200/F4 MICRO與Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM這兩支相比較(銳利度、反差、色澤、對焦速度),何者熟優?
===========================================================================================
我想先感謝j8763617大大給予的建議
這兩支鏡頭我真的沒去比較過
只是我是用NIKON系統
如果Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro
的銳利度、反差、色澤、對焦速度
都優於NIKON AF ED 200/F4 MICRO
我想應該不會為了一隻鏡頭去換整套系統
當然還是感謝j8763617大大給的建議
以及各位大大給的參考資料與經驗
小弟我真的受益良多
真的有感謝
回上一層 第1頁 / 共1頁 到第 1
手札小舖熱門商品
【Nikon入門者超值包】享74折,立省249元!
DSLR必殺技超值包《旅遊攝影+必殺技》
史上最殺!★Canon 600D超值包★
【Nikon D4 / D800 完全活用】晉升Nikon專業旗艦必備寶典!
【Nikon D3200 完全活用】最佳入門手冊!
攝影家手札數位影像坊DV哈燒網KeyBuy藝廊論壇
服務信箱:242204 新莊副都心郵局第12信箱 │ 會員服務部:02-85215082(上班時間早上9點~下午6點) 和平東路三段276號 │ 廣告專線:0937-887229 │ 總瀏覽1161708831人 │ 線上1482人
攝影家手札科技有限公司 版權所有 © 2017 PhotoSharp All Rights Reserved. 非經許可,請勿任意轉載、出版本站內容