攝影家手札Forum- 《香港論壇》D2Hs／論壇

論壇主選單 > 香港論壇 > D2Hs

作者	討論話題
D1XF90X 網路會員	2005/02/16 14:58 器材: 其他其他 http://www.dpreview.com/articles/nikond2hs/ still 4mp

wwkm 網路會員	21) 2005/02/17 00:25 <今次pma只只出這部D2Hs, 等於叻狂向驚撚宣佈佢地投降, 玩唔掂pro dslr.> D2H ---> D2Hs D70 ---> D70s ?????? Ha Ha !
wwkm 網路會員	22) 2005/02/17 00:26 D70 ---> D70s HK$6k+ ---> HK$8k+ Ha Ha !
wwkm 網路會員	23) 2005/02/17 00:29 換湯不換藥 !
ken L 網路會員	24) 2005/02/17 00:46 整番部同20d差唔多嘅,争番個中階市埸好過啦,d100 mk2 頂級邊夠驚狼泥丫,中下階市埸最好揾,力狂唔識計數..ha...ha....
漢仔部落格(1) 網路會員	25) 2005/02/17 00:59 圖片中那枝是200/2？好靚仔呀~
wwkm 網路會員	26) 2005/02/17 02:35 三枝都好靚仔呀! 可色銀包唔靚仔.
*香港至NET超人* 網路會員	27) 2005/02/17 09:41 多像素而濛, 同埋少像素而SHARP, 你會點選? NIKON果個4百萬, 是三層四百萬, 有Ｄ似SIGMA果類, 早自SIGMA SD9(3百萬)就已經剎低6百萬像素DSLR.
henrykwl 網路會員	28) 2005/02/17 10:04 Even I don't know the quality of D2Hs, I would opt for image quality to trade up the image size. The reasons : 1. Less megapixel, more portable file size 2. Better and sharper image, less post processing through software 3. Smaller file size, less chance to upgrade your computer to a kinda giant monster 4. Yet ready decent image, yet ready to use, print or trade for money. <== Just my opinion, sorry to all if you don't agree **
henrykwl 網路會員	29) 2005/02/17 10:07 Typo ========== Even I don't know the quality of D2Hs, I would opt for image quality to trade OFF the image size. The reasons : 1. Less megapixel, more portable file size 2. Better and sharper image, less post processing through software 3. Smaller file size, less chance to upgrade your computer to a kinda giant monster 4. Yet ready decent image, yet ready to use, print or trade for money. <== Just my opinion, sorry to all if you don't agree **
神我人網路會員	30) 2005/02/17 11:26 B4 I also quection about the 4mp sensor of D2Hs... But... What will you say if that 4mp can output a nice 24x36 inches Photo... By Nikon D2H http://www.grafphoto.com/articles/printdogma.html
Peter LO 網路會員	31) 2005/02/17 11:41 LBCAST應該不是多層感色，而是通過減低厚度、提高光電效率等來提高影像質素： http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/portfolio/technology_e/lbcast_e/index.htm
*香港至NET超人* 網路會員	32) 2005/02/17 12:09 呀, LBCAST唔係三層, 咁點解4MPIX有咁既質素?
wwkm 網路會員	33) 2005/02/17 14:14 <http://www.grafphoto.com/articles/printdogma.html> 啊 ! 如果 4MP LBCAST 1.5x sensor 能夠有咁既大size印刷既質素, 那麼 N牌出個 12MP LBCAST (不必要 full frame !), C牌既 1DMkII 甚至 1DsMkII 味要行開一邊 !
wwkm 網路會員	34) 2005/02/17 14:15 Typo 啊 ! 如果 4MP LBCAST 1.5x sensor 能夠有咁既大size印刷既質素, 那麼 N牌出個 12MP LBCAST (不必要 full frame !), C牌既 1DMkII 甚至 1DsMkII 味要行開一邊 !
G.O.B. 網路會員	35) 2005/02/17 14:16 唔出奇丫
wwkm 網路會員	36) 2005/02/17 14:35 唔通 LBCAST DX至系N牌既主力, D2X 只系用泥招呼下 1DsMkII ? 等到有能力出大過10MP LBCAST DX 至出手 ...... D2Xs !
Peter LO 網路會員	37) 2005/02/17 16:15 咦，論壇選頁功能回來了！
G.O.B. 網路會員	38) 2005/02/17 16:36 有咩出奇呢？
三日網路會員	39) 2005/02/17 16:50 我都覺得像素唔係唯一既關鍵, 最重要係粒sensor既質素
wwkm 網路會員	40) 2005/02/17 20:23 sensor既質素固然重要,但誰又廉像素多呢? 連C牌 EOS 350D 入門機都有8MP了 ! A3 ... no problem !