回論壇首頁
論壇主選單 > 香港論壇 > 擁有G21 及 NIKON AFS17-35 的用家請進
作者  
討論話題
 

chemistry


網路會員

2004/06/17 13:08
器材: 其他 其他
請教各位
若拍正片為主
兩鏡在同一焦距上(21mm)
質素上如何

因已擁有NIKON的17-35
但看見各用家都超讚這支G21
所以有點心動,打算購入G21為旅遊之用
請給點意見吧, 謝

mickey_mouse


網路會員

1) 2004/06/17 13:26 
prime lenses is more easy to design and produce than prime lenses.
Wide angle for RF is more easy to design and produce than wide angle for SLR.  
Nikon, Contax, Zeiss........ are all good company in photography.

If the above points are correct, will you expect a wide zoon for slr has better quality than a wide prime lenses for rf?

Just depends how much you want to give to get the better quality.

Arthur塗夫


網路會員

2) 2004/06/17 14:19 
prime lenses are more easy to design and produce than ZOOM lenses.

mickey_mouse


網路會員

3) 2004/06/17 14:20 
Everyone speaks something that others do not understand recently in this forum.
including me.

Arthur塗夫


網路會員

4) 2004/06/17 14:21 
haha...

Tam


網路會員

5) 2004/06/17 15:12 
I used to have both lenses.
The advantage of the AFS Nikkor is of cause its convinence and the flexible zoom range. However, it is not in the same league of the G21 in terms of optical quality. The biogon is really legendary and beats every lens in this focal length except the Hassy SWC and its cousin Contax C/Y distagon 21/2.8. Frankly speaking, the distortion of AFS 17-35 makes many photos unacceptable, while the biogon is distortion free. I advice you to get one for travel, however, please beware that you may buy the whole G system after you recieve the stuuning photos produced by the G21, and you may start to sell your existing Nikon system, just like what I did.
Tam

Arthur塗夫


網路會員

6) 2004/06/17 15:25 
agree with Tam.

as a contax user, i think that G21 is a good bargain, I would say it is cheap with regards to its superb performance. Both D21/2.8 & SWC are relatively expensive and heavier. HOWEVER, I strongly advise you
find some sildes or photos taken with G21 before you buy it. You better have a rough idea about G lenses" character in color rendition
before you buy it. See if it suits your taste. It is a matter of
personal taste as well as optical quality.

Photoleung


網路會員

7) 2004/06/17 16:10 
Biogon 21mm still have distortion but with a much lesser extent than those SLR lenses, and Hologon 16mm is the only G lens that show 0% distortion on chart.

Some G21 Sample:-
http://www.f-abstract.com/Gallery/CeskyKrumlov/4637_14a.html
http://www.f-abstract.com/Gallery/CeskyKrumlov/4637_14a.html
http://www.f-abstract.com/Gallery/CeskyKrumlov/4637_15a.html
http://www.f-abstract.com/Gallery/CeskyKrumlov/4637_02a.html

jsklee


網路會員

8) 2004/06/17 17:21 
"please beware that you may buy the whole G system after you recieve the stuuning photos produced by the G21, and you may start to sell your existing Nikon system, just like what I did."

After I bought the G21, I have sold all my Canon L lens!

jsklee


網路會員

9) 2004/06/17 17:22 
Prime lens is always better than zoom lens, especially when the prime lens is designed for RF.

jsklee


網路會員

10) 2004/06/17 17:22 

zerozero


網路會員

11) 2004/06/17 17:37 

Photoleung


網路會員

12) 2004/06/17 17:45 
Where did you take your H16 photos?

zerozero


網路會員

13) 2004/06/17 17:47 

Arthur塗夫


網路會員

14) 2004/06/17 18:02 
Chemistry talks about 17~35 bor.
We have H16 and B21 now.
Does anyone  post some photos taken
with Planar 35/2? Planar is an
appealing design from CZ. Hehe...

BTW, where is chemistry?

jsklee


網路會員

15) 2004/06/17 18:04 
zerozero:

Did you use the central grey filter for your G16?

jsklee


網路會員

16) 2004/06/17 18:09 
"Does anyone post some photos taken
with Planar 35/2? Planar is an
appealing design from CZ. Hehe..."

Hope my test could be a reference:
http://www.pbase.com/jsklee_contax

Arthur塗夫


網路會員

17) 2004/06/17 18:19 
扮andy warhol?

7張都係同一個look啵,
近係唔算數啦.

Photoleung


網路會員

18) 2004/06/17 18:20 
BTW, who is andy warhol?

Arthur塗夫


網路會員

19) 2004/06/17 18:28 
see if there is similarity between these two series of images:

http://www.warhol.dk/gallery/art/2.html

http://www.pbase.com/jsklee_contax/contax_g35

zerozero


網路會員

20) 2004/06/17 18:53 
H16 pix were taken in West Lake and Wu Town.
jsklee,
I never use ND filter. Dark corners can be concealed if pix are carefully composed. Sometimes, dark corners really enhance the effects given out.
I terms of picture quality, I think H16 can beat B21 comfortably. However, B21 is much much more convenient to be used.
回上一層 第1頁 / 共3頁 到第 頁   下一頁   最末頁 1 2 3
手札小舖熱門商品
【Nikon D4 / D800 完全活用】晉升Nikon專業旗艦必備寶典!
【Nikon D3200 完全活用】最佳入門手冊!
【2012攝影年鑑】★攝影家手札2012年度鉅獻正式登場!!
【Nikon 1完全活用解析】全新系統完全剖析!
【駕馭閃光燈】最完整的閃燈指導教本!!
攝影家手札數位影像坊DV哈燒網KeyBuy藝廊論壇
服務信箱:242204 新莊副都心郵局第12信箱 │ 會員服務部:02-85215082(上班時間早上9點~下午6點) 和平東路三段276號 │ 廣告專線:0937-887229 │ 總瀏覽1169857994人 │ 線上1483人
攝影家手札科技有限公司 版權所有 © 2017 PhotoSharp All Rights Reserved. 非經許可,請勿任意轉載、出版本站內容