喱個問題我都曾經考慮過, 但當試過Scan菲林既效果同埋計過條數之後, 得出結論係如果影既相大多數都會數碼化的話, 就唔好考慮買Film Scanner, 因為個Running cost到頭來都係差無幾, 但個效果同方便性就冇得同DSLR比, 而且個用Film數碼化個後製仲鬼咁麻煩... 如果影得唔多, 都唔好買Film Scanner, 有需要先至攞去俾人Scan或者自己用Flatbed直接Scan已經晒o左出蒞既相。

我一個月打得個幾筒菲林, 所以而家係後者個做法。但300D出時可能會買都唔奇, 睇睇部機過唔過到自己果關先; 不過就算過到自己都仲要過埋老婆果關至得... -_-;;;

In fact, DC also not bad ga~~
Why ppl need to distinguish between DC and D-SLR
Both of them can create beautiful~~

Because D-SLR is more expensive, give ppl a superior image?

the choice really depends on ur personal preference.

i myself like viewing the slides using light boxes, and i also bought a filmscanner to digitize them and to put them on the web for sharing.  though it is time consuming, i find it is worth it.

the more trivial benefit of dslr is that they can preview the pic onsite and to retake if necessary.  cost savings from dslr only comes when the photographer takes lots and lots of pictures using it (ofcourse not keep taking rubbish pics).

300D好似明天到香港wow，下個月有得賣

Unless you want to spend hours and hours to play with the computer software of scanning, otherwise just buy a DSLR and use the time to go taking picture la.

See the comparison of D60 and Medium Format below:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/d60/d60.shtml

The conclusion is:
"35mm Photographers: If you"ve been waiting to make the move to digital but haven"t felt that the cost / quality / image size equation worked for you yet — well, I think the time has come — especially if you already own some Canon EOS lenses. On A3 (11X17") and smaller prints the D60 is a champ and there"s little advantage to film anymore." (quote from Michael Reichmann)

The trading in of Pentax 67 for a 1Ds is quite a radical move. And I think most of the professionals (I guess users of Pentax 67 are usually professionals, or at least some really enthusiastic amateurs) will not do that (at least for the time being).

As to the comparison of and discussion of Film (or scanned film) VS. DSLR, there are already a lot of discussion in the forum and I think people will choose among themselves acccording to their needs and taste.  But I think, to general amateurs who are not too picky as to image quality, nowadays DSLR (e.g. D100, D60) can satisfy them already since many of them prefer to watch and share photos thro" monitor and on the web (at least I am impressed by many "sunset" photos on this website taken by DSLR).

Final words, DSLR photos (viewed thro" monitor) cannot beat the the 3-D feeling of looking at a slide thro" lightbox and loupe.

我都知300d唔係一個好好既選擇，但budget有限...
想買dslr既原因都係為方便，講質數，個人要求唔係太高，even連睇手扎鏡頭比較既文章，都唔覺有咩分別(除非係跟機樳裝既雞鏡)。
論質數，我都同意不如上120。

其實都想買10d，因為我有canon 系統，所以只考慮canon。但300d同佢差3-4千蚊又多支鏡，而功能又唔係差太遠....但10d out-fo問題好似幾嚴重，都幾擔心300d會係咁，所以都會睇定少少，下個月睇下有咩用家報告先。

For quality, film + scanner

For convenience, DC or DSLR

300d收到風有淨Body賣
$7000，可能仲會平！(吾知係咩價)

Vir:
"use 135 take superwide = eat banana
unless u like fisheye"

唔明你意思...