回論壇首頁
論壇主選單 > 香港論壇 > 去歐洲, 帶甚麼鏡好?
作者  
討論話題
 

brotherkei


新進會員

2003/07/28 18:02
器材: 其他 其他
小弟用M記, 現有:
Dynax 7
24-105/3.5-4.5
50/1.7
100-300/4.5-5.6
可能會買:
Tamron 19-35/3.5-4.5

而家心大心細, 唔知點帶好. 同行個friend話帶哂而家有D鏡, 19-35唔駛, 但我驚唔夠用, 又驚帶哂好辛苦. 點算好? 請大家比D idea我啦...

mark k


新進會員

1) 2003/07/28 18:40 
When I went to Europe last year I brought
Dynax 7, 800si and Dimage 7i with
20, 24-105, 28-70/2.8, 80-200/2.8, 1.4TX, tripod
A digital camera gives you much more freedom.

Because I shoot both positive and negative films, I need at least two bodies.

joecsk


新進會員

2) 2003/07/28 18:53 
Last time when I went to Malysia, I took 24-85 and 80-200. Finally, I only used the 80-200 twice in the Hotel.


joecsk


新進會員

3) 2003/07/28 18:57 
By the way, 19-35 is better for Europe as last time when I was in Europe, I used 24-50 but always found insufficiently wide to capture the beautiful old building.

dennistth


新進會員

4) 2003/07/28 19:17 
Bring your Dynax 7 with 24-105mm lens and a snap-shot camera or a digital camera. Last year, I brought my Dynax 800si with Tamron 24-135mm SP and Ricoh GR1s to Europe last summer, I found that's very enough for me already. 24mm is enough for landscape and 105mm is enough for snap shot. Heavy load will bring your 'pain' during trip (that means you cannot enjoy the trip much, unless your aim is to take pictures only). Furthermore, bring a solid, small and light tripod along, that's very essential. A film x-ray protection bag is useful if you are going to bring high speed films, enough battery and films are very important too.
Enjoy your trip!

mickey_mouse


新進會員

5) 2003/07/28 19:29 
I would just bring 19-35 and 50 for my own habits and the situation you may face in Europe.   I seldom use tele.

if you also have habbit or using tele.

19-35, 50 and 100-300 are very good combination.

for quality and larget apeture you get the 50.  you also have super wide that you may use it most of the time in europe and 100-300 as tele.

Add also a p&s camera for snapshot and to ask other to take photos of yourself.

老牛三七一五


新進會員

6) 2003/07/28 20:23 
去歐州旅行,人生一大快事.攝影器材我提議帶24-105和100-300.
這樣不會錯過任美景.最好帶1枝脚作為影夜景用,免到時後悔,因我有1師兄有此絰驗
況旅途愉快,收獲豐富.

漢仔

部落格(1)
新進會員

7) 2003/07/28 20:50 
試過帶slr去長途旅行,
跟團兼且同家人,
專心影相既時間根本吾多,
地點亦未必理想...
唉,一些導遊鍾意帶你去購物...

帶一整套slr重裝備?我勸你三思而後行.
成日掛住取景換鏡,有時會大煞風景...
何不輕輕鬆鬆?

再去旅行的話,我不會帶slr,
只會取一部rf,2-3鏡,小閃燈,一般背囊己經綽綽有餘,
或是一部高階傻瓜機,起碼可以控制光圈.
很多底片.

祝你旅途愉快!

brotherkei


新進會員

8) 2003/07/29 11:08 
Thank you so much all of you, but opinion here also varies a lot. May I ask, is it true that without a sufficiently wide angle lens (24mm or less) one would very likely miss many architecture shots?

yeechan


新進會員

9) 2003/07/29 11:33 
Tamron 19-35/3.5-4.5

good deal

wongwai


新進會員

10) 2003/07/29 11:47 
“Is it true that without a sufficiently wide angle lens (24mm or less) one would very likely miss many architecture shots?”

The ans is yes.  When I was in Japan and Bangkok, I need a reasonable wide angles (17-35) lens to capture the whole view of a temple.  Image all the castles and churches in Europe.  I think wide is a must.

goroneko


新進會員

11) 2003/07/29 13:40 
i suggest you bring all you have!

香港至*NET*超人


新進會員

12) 2003/07/29 14:30 
唔好買19-35之類, 要買就買tokina atx17/3.5, 超廣角zoom好極有限, 影起耀光又變形大.
去旅行最緊要玩得開心, 帶得太多器材反而變成心理及生理壓力, 你影得再好都唔會靚過明
信片, 好多相都係酊此一遊, 藝術價值不會太高, 反而是人生的一個重要記錄, 記錄的是個
人享受那次旅行, 而非做了器材奴僕. 依我所見, 如果是跟團去, 因為冇時間setup及換鏡等,
一機三鏡已經係頂晒籠, 自由行就帶咩都得, 問題係衫褲鞋襪通通係身到, 揹得愈多就愈快
玩殘而無晒mood去影相, 自己好好衡量一下吧.

ALEXLAM


新進會員

13) 2003/07/29 15:09 
I've visited Europe with a "duckling tour" before. Honestly speaking, you don't have much time to take photos especially the guide has to take care a lot of people with different tastes. (Most of them prefer shopping to taking photos).
Yes, you may visit the Cathedrals and museums in Rome,Italy and Paris, France. But according to my past experience, you won't have much time to stay a long wide,since there are so many tourists that you are pushed to move.
So I would like to suggest you to bring an AF20mm f2.8 anf the AF24-85(105)mm of Minolta are enough. But remember to bring one to two rolls ISO 1000/1600 films with you for some of the museums forbid people to use flash (you are allowed to use camera). Be aware of your pockets especially in the crowded areas.
Hope you enjoy you trip!

mickey_mouse


新進會員

14) 2003/07/29 17:01 
agree to buy tokina atx17/3.5,  instead of wide zoom.

>問題係衫褲鞋襪通通係身到, 揹得愈多就愈快
玩殘而無晒mood去影相, 自己好好衡量一下吧

from my past experience, I place most stuffs in hotel/motel lobby.  just go out with a backpack with water, reasonable number of films, camera, lenses, windstopper........

I revise my suggestion as 17mm, 50mm, tripod, a very very small manual flash.

I go Europe twice with the following things.
2 ricoh 35R (for 3D slides)
Canon T90,
canon New-F1 (as backup, place in hotel luggage most of the time)
Manfotto  manual flash (cost less than %150, GN20)
FD20-35mm (above 90% useage)
FD50 (less than 5%usage alone another 5% as tele/macro with 2X)
FD2XB
FD135f2 (only a few shots)
Tripods.
Rollei Pergo 70 for asking people to help me to take photos.

I use more tahn 100 roll of slides for 19days.  (huge usages because 3D slides consumpt double for every shoots.

I only use camera bag when i am on flight.  I use ordinary backpack to save weights when going out daily.  The camera back will be places in hotel/motel lobby with other luggages.  

I only take out a littel big more than necessary film out while other are placed with other luggages when i am out.

we can only share experience but you have to choose by yourself as different photographer get different habbits.

happy shooting.

brotherkei


新進會員

15) 2003/07/30 00:06 
Thank you all of you for your comments. In fact we're not following a package tour. we just go there on our own. I decided to forget the super wide side, because I already have a 24-105, and I think spending an extra thousand dollars or two for just 5mm wider focal length isn't that cost-effective. Now I face another question. Shall I not be so lazy that I even put my 100-300/4.5-5.6 home? Is it useful in Europe?

I plan to bring the following films for my 24 day Europe trip:
E100VS x 24
RDP x 20
RHP x 20
Tri-X x 18
This would make about 3.5 rolls per day only, but I'll also have a Canon A70 plus 512MB of compact flash cards with me. From your experience, would it be enough? My friend has a budget of 5 rolls per day!

One last question. Is tripod generally allowed in Europe? If not, any idea of how I can manage to take long exposures? Thanks all again for your patience.

香港至*NET*超人


新進會員

16) 2003/07/30 00:13 
24mm and 17mm are HUGE difference!

mickey_mouse


新進會員

17) 2003/07/30 00:17 
in term of angle of view, 1 mm is already in great difference in lenses under 24mm.

jsklee


新進會員

18) 2003/07/30 02:05 
recommend prime lens and tripod!

Gowest


新進會員

19) 2003/07/30 12:44 
咁岩我又係用M記DYNAX7加埋枝24-105同100-300喎。

正如之前咁多位講,我都係話去旅行映相最緊要簡便囉,去旅行但求享受下,如果掛到成頸都係野仲加埋個相機袋論論盡盡咁就盞冇癮,我自己就有咁既經驗。每次旅行見到其他絕大部分遊客都係拎住DC或者傻瓜機,有d仲用即棄果d相機菲林添,不知玩得幾瀟灑,相反自己就一舊二舊重到死又辛苦,果陣真係覺得自己好鬼笨實好無謂囉。仲有呀,好多時諗set好副架生換下鏡但係攪得兩攪又俾老婆鬧,話人地映相你映相你映得零舍麻煩過人映得又唔係特別靚喎,又話淨係掛住映景又唔映人。咁諗諗下其實佢又講得幾岩既。

計我話去旅行不如帶部攝錄機去好過啦,一部DV加部DC就最perfect。

brotherkei


新進會員

20) 2003/07/30 13:30 
Superman, I understand the 17mm prime is great, but when I don't even have the budget for the 19-35 at the moment, I won't be able to afford the 17mm, which is even more expensive.

Maybe 5mm is really a big difference, but would this extra 5mm be indispensible in Europe? If so, then I have to think of methods to squeeze more money for it. Time is short. I'm going 5 days later!
回上一層 第1頁 / 共3頁 到第 頁   下一頁   最末頁 1 2 3
手札小舖熱門商品
【Nikon D4 / D800 完全活用】晉升Nikon專業旗艦必備寶典!
【Nikon D3200 完全活用】最佳入門手冊!
【2012攝影年鑑】★攝影家手札2012年度鉅獻正式登場!!
【Nikon 1完全活用解析】全新系統完全剖析!
【駕馭閃光燈】最完整的閃燈指導教本!!
攝影家手札數位影像坊DV哈燒網KeyBuy藝廊論壇
服務信箱:242204 新莊副都心郵局第12信箱 │ 會員服務部:02-85215082(上班時間早上9點~下午6點) 和平東路三段276號 │ 廣告專線:0937-887229 │ 總瀏覽1169851497人 │ 線上1483人
攝影家手札科技有限公司 版權所有 © 2017 PhotoSharp All Rights Reserved. 非經許可,請勿任意轉載、出版本站內容