Canvas_Chen

網路會員

2004/09/15 12:15 請先登入後才可回應

器材: 其他其他

引述自http://forum.cameraunion.net/showthread.php?threadid=242509

昨天(14日)Nikon法國總部向批發商和部分專業用戶發佈了D2X, F6和新鏡300/2.8VR.

D2X: 12.4MP, 5FPS, 可拍15張NEF. 2X模式為8FPS, 6.9MP. ISO100-800, 1600-3200透過選單開啟. 雙向無線, 可快速傳輸資料並由電腦遙控. DXO集成局部曝光控制, 提高寬容度. 機身基本和D2H相同, 除垂直手把有微小更動. 仍然是1005彩色矩陣測光, 但演算法改進.
法國價格: 5200歐元(包括VAT)
註: DOX是透過鏡頭的資訊來矯正畫面變形.

F6: 取代F5和F100. 和F100相近大小. 垂直手把?選購配件. 5FPS, 加手把後8FPS. AF系統同D2H, I-TTL, 比F100機身強度高很多(和F5/D2系列同等級)
法國價格: 2200歐元(包括VAT)

消息來源:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/112358/39

真實性有多高等9/16 Nikon正式發佈時就曉得了..

咕嚕咕嚕網路會員	1) 2004/09/15 12:18 Nikon~~衝啦
starphoto 網路會員	2) 2004/09/15 12:37 2x模式 6.9mp！！？何解！？是否高於1.5x！？那麼是否意味像素密度更高！那是否代表視窗會有一方格顯示！？？DX鏡頭合用嗎！？為何F6體積縮小！！將垂直手柄分開！？為降低售價！？
shsiao 網路會員	3) 2004/09/15 12:38 只有一隻 300f2.8VR 喔? 那 500f4 VR 要等到何時
Canvas_Chen 網路會員	4) 2004/09/15 12:46 2x模式 6.9mp！！？何解！？是否高於1.5x！？那麼是否意味像素密度更高！那是否代表視窗會有一方格顯示！？？DX鏡頭合用嗎！？ ------------------------------- D2X推測應該還是APS Size, 所以還是可用DX鏡頭. 所謂的2X模式只是取中間的6.9MP成相部分, 減少資料傳送量, 以增加連拍速度. 跟不開2X模式拍12.4MP然後用軟體切出來中央部分的6.9MP影像內容是一樣的.
Bikeman 網路會員	5) 2004/09/15 12:50 期待喔~ 正式發表的日子應該不遠了!~ ^^
shsiao 網路會員	6) 2004/09/15 13:05 那2X 模式的視角就跟 E-1 一樣了 300 f2.8 VR 會變成 600 f2.8 VR
starphoto 網路會員	7) 2004/09/15 13:18 12.8mp像素 aps size！？！即像素密度高一倍！其實係咪要再執著135的全幅面呢！？現在給1.5X DX超廣角鏡都算足夠！再加上日後繼續發展！這樣攝記不再需要背著沉重的600mm大炮了，300mm x 2=600mm ！攝記可輕磅不小！還有f2.8大光圈！ D2H似乎要降價了！！
kuankuoyun2002 網路會員	8) 2004/09/15 13:25 you hit it on the head. IF they can get decent noise performance out of the smallest pixels, go watch all the full frame people quiet up. it would effectively be a combo 1ds/Mark II camera -but ONLY if it does not take 2 steps backward in the noise department like the d2h did. it doesnt have to be "as" super noise free as the Mark II, but it better be at least close. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10276965
starphoto 網路會員	9) 2004/09/15 13:31 補充個人睇法！電腦可搖控也是一絕！！甚放便！這台D2X如是真的話，根本是替代D2H！配合全新300VR F2.8鏡，完全為攝記而設！！
kuankuoyun2002 網路會員	10) 2004/09/15 13:56 F6 = CAM2000 but F5,F100 = CAM1300 (nt) http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10276590
kuankuoyun2002 網路會員	11) 2004/09/15 14:08 Integrated DXO ... why is no one talking about this? To me this is the big surprise. Integrated optics correction. Very cool. Fewer problems with "bad sample" lenses. Maybe even lighter, non-pro grade lenses will become more popular http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10276290
sjmoore 網路會員	12) 2004/09/15 14:14 關於DXO，我比較好奇的是副廠鏡頭怎麼辦？
kuankuoyun2002 網路會員	13) 2004/09/15 14:20 DXO is basically software that corrects lens issues (distortion, chromatic abberation, vingetting, etc). You shoot the DXO test targets with the lens/camera combo, then feed the results into the software. Then the software determines how to fix the lens abberations and applies this filter to all shots taken with that lens. Very cool and long overdue IMHO http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10276595
starphoto 網路會員	14) 2004/09/15 14:27 N家你想做最後的主角嗎！！連M家也開動了！！期待N家你的D2X真面目！！
kuankuoyun2002 網路會員	15) 2004/09/15 14:28 ........................................achieve the same effect without sacrificing imager surface area. In simple terms, this would be like being able to turn on a contrast mask, kind of like a split neutral density filter, for high dynamic range scenes. You can simulate this with any digital camera by taking multiple, bracketed exposures of such a scene - with a tripod - and blending them in various ways, but it would be great to be able to do this in one exposure, in-camera and without the need for a tripod. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10276625
starphoto 網路會員	16) 2004/09/15 14:29 N家你想做最後的主角嗎！！連M家也開動了！！期待N家你的D2X真面目！！
JoeCool 網路會員	17) 2004/09/15 15:20 個人一些小小看法,垂直把手跟機身分離是個好設計, (或說是靈活的市場策略) 整合在一起當然有好處,但就是缺了彈性. 頂級機不應該被定形成, 一定就是要約定俗成,"長這個模樣"吧? 包括機頂閃燈有無的設計也是. (單純只是針對自己的習慣而言)
122459 網路會員	18) 2004/09/15 16:12 DOX技術在E1上已見應用
kuankuoyun2002 網路會員	19) 2004/09/15 16:31 I doubt that DXO will be integrated into the camera"s DSP. However, I am intrigued by the possibility of increasing the imager"s dynamic range by individually addressing photocells in an asynchronous manner. If this turns out to be a capability of the D2X"s CMOS (or whatever) imager, this could trump the Fujifilm S3"s HDR-like abilities. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10276625
kuankuoyun2002 網路會員	20) 2004/09/15 16:39 hoping that the photo images from D2X are as best as S3 and E1

回上一層第1頁 / 共11頁到第頁下一頁最末頁	到 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 頁│下10頁│

手札小舖熱門商品

more..