照片的影像叫做網膜像 retinal image
眼睛看的叫做視覺像 visual image

兩者之間最大的差異就是前者有邊界範圍，有視框 Frame 後者沒有

所以，在視覺現場看視覺像，所得的內容，和從照片看的網膜像的內容是截然不同的

所以，你講的用腦袋看，和看照片，是兩回事喔！

其實我覺得更困難的，是如何從別人的各式各樣的照片中找出你要的部分，而重新組合出一張有意義的圖片來，那樣的修行恐怕更困難吧 ：）

---

那安迪．沃荷就是剖竊大師了

---

那個，我應該是是在菜場龍蛇雜處想著遠離塵世的深山的修行者。


～～XD XD XD

---

吳校長：

學習攝影的五大不能拍
1.老人小孩
2.貓狗寵物
3.古厝廟宇
4.慶典集會遊行
5.女體

講的就是要我們在學習攝影的階段，避免被這些歧異性的被攝體呼喚去拍他們

但是，通常剛學攝影的年輕小伙子上街拍的盡都是這些五大不能拍

拍出來的照片，之所以會好看，會吸引觀者的目光，都是因為被攝體本身的有趣、被攝體本身的歧異性

而非攝影者的視覺能力有多好

幫忙轉錄

我歡拍照的原因 其實蠻單純的 就是想拍出來我想要的東西 , 不論是紀錄的還是不是紀錄的 , 要有自己的喜好 ,總之 ,我就是喜歡研究攝影 ,希望拍出我要的感覺 .......

---

Affordance 的定義與解釋

History & Definitions

Psychologist James J. Gibson originally introduced the term in his 1977 article The Theory of Affordances^[1] and explored it more fully in his book The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception^[2] in 1979. He defined affordances as all "action possibilities" latent in the environment, objectively measurable and independent of the individual's ability to recognize them, but always in relation to the actor and therefore dependent on their capabilities. For instance, a set of steps which rises four feet high does not afford the act of climbing if the actor is a crawling infant. Gibson's is the prevalent definition in cognitive psychology.

Jakob von Uexküll had already discussed the concept in the early twentieth century^[3], calling it the "functional colouring" (funktionale Tönung) of objects.

In 1988, Donald Norman appropriated the term affordances in the context of Human–Machine Interaction to refer to just those action possibilities which are readily perceivable by an actor. Through his book The Design of Everyday Things,^[4] this interpretation was popularized within the fields of HCI and interaction design. It makes the concept dependent not only on the physical capabilities of the actor, but also their goals, plans, values, beliefs and past experience. If an actor steps into a room with an armchair and a softball, Gibson's original definition of affordances allows that the actor may toss the recliner and sit on the softball, because that is objectively possible. Norman's definition of (perceived) affordances captures the likelihood that the actor will sit on the recliner and toss the softball, because of their past experience with these objects. Effectively, Norman's affordances "suggest" how an object may be interacted with.

Norman later explained that this adaptation of the term had been unintended.^[5][6] However, the definition from his book has become established enough in HCI that both uses have to be accepted as convention in this field.

>吳校長：

>學習攝影的五大不能拍

>1. 老人小孩

>2. 貓狗寵物

>3. 古厝廟宇

>4. 慶典集會遊行

>5. 女體

 

 

 

加一個：

6. 晨昏彩霞

 

  

 

例如，試著拍一個自己最熟悉的人，看看能夠拍出幾張不同的畫面。
不是那種變一變姿勢、換換背景、換換服裝而已的變化，而是視覺結構迥然不同的畫面。

你不妨參考攝影史上的 著名大師 Harry Callahan 拍他的太太 Eleanor 和他的女兒 Barbara 的作品：
1.http://images.google.com.tw/imgres?imgurl=http://www.masters-of-fine-art-photography.com/02/artphotogallery/database/harry_callahan_01.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.masters-of-fine-art-photography.com/02/artphotogallery/photographers/harry_callahan_01.html&h=383&w=383&sz=15&hl=zh-TW&start=1&um=1&tbnid=Tupj0-EPHgnTPM:&tbnh=123&tbnw=123&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dharry%2Bcallahan%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26complete%3D1%26hl%3Dzh-TW%26client%3Dfirefox%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:zh-TW:official%26sa%3DN
2.http://www.masters-of-fine-art-photography.com/02/artphotogallery/photographers/harry_callahan_03.html
3.http://www.masters-of-fine-art-photography.com/02/artphotogallery/photographers/harry_callahan_05.html
4.http://www.masters-of-fine-art-photography.com/02/artphotogallery/photographers/harry_callahan_06.html
5.http://www.masters-of-fine-art-photography.com/02/artphotogallery/photographers/harry_callahan_07.html
6.http://www.masters-of-fine-art-photography.com/02/artphotogallery/photographers/harry_callahan_19.html
7.http://www.masters-of-fine-art-photography.com/02/artphotogallery/photographers/harry_callahan_04.html
8.http://www.brown.edu/Facilities/David_Winton_Bell_Gallery/images/callahan_eleanor_small_im.jpg
9.http://www.morehousegallery.com/images/inventory/300/CALLAHAN%20H%2000199.jpg
10.http://www.josephbellows.com/files/4cb35997.jpg
11.http://web.ncf.ca/ek867/callahan.eleanor..jpg
12.http://www.tfaoi.com/cm/4cm/4cm860.jpg
13.http://www.high.org/uploadedImages/experience/exhibitions/Callahan.Eleanor.1948B.jpg
14.http://www.iphotocentral.com/Photos/VintageWorks_Images/Mid/8073Callahan.jpg

當然，你無須把你的朋友或家人脫光，就像 Harry 並不是每一張都把他的太太脫光一樣。

你也不妨試著想想看，如果你是一本雜誌社的主編，你想讓一位攝影家負責明年一整年的雜誌封面的攝影，你這位主編會對這位攝影家拍出來的12張封面做什麼樣的要求？

這就是視覺書寫能力啊！