新進會員
| |
新進會員
|
quote:
有冇人用過 Kodak 160 VC Prof.?
唔知係咪技術問題，我用左幾次 160VC／160NC ，出黎既效果都係好怪既，效果好似顏色啞左，無乜色彩，而且紅色方面好似好濃，唔知點解？
水中月 |
新進會員
|
quote:
quote:
有冇人用過 Kodak 160 VC Prof.?
唔知係咪技術問題，我用左幾次 160VC／160NC ，出黎既效果都係好怪既，效果好似顏色啞左，無乜色彩，而且紅色方面好似好濃，唔知點解？
水中月
要搵岩曬相舖至得‥‥唔係間間有160channel‥‥冇既話分分鐘當你200沖‥‥即係晒氣‥‥
得歡笑時且歡笑 |
新進會員
|
支持KODACHROME! KODACHROME萬萬歲!! 說真的, 只有KODACHROME可以包容最濃郁的色彩之時, 還保持解像度, 不會像E6菲林的, 要紅時加一PAT番茄漿, 要藍時漸變地方沒有了, 要綠時就搶到生菜變菜心.... 負片有分別, 不過永遠少於打相師父既分別, 又少過沖洗藥水新舊的分別. 不是到LAB沖晒, 甚麼負片都沒有大分別.
----------Never ever visit these site---------
http://ctlee.0catch.com/
http://www.images.com.hk/
|
新進會員
|
"支持KODACHROME! KODACHROME萬萬歲!!"
KODACHROME (KR 64) 剛買了!
但是否有一隻slide 叫 KODACHROME 200(kl 200)?又是拿回kodak 香港沖?在什麼地方有得賣?
暗攝者燈燈 |
新進會員
|
KODACHROME 200 Professional Film / PKL
will be discontinued mid-year 2001
KODACHROME 25 Film / KM
replaced
KODACHROME 25 Professional Film / PKM
這是在KODAK網頁內所見, 在香港可有 KODACHROME 25 (KM) 出售?
|
新進會員
|
在香港可有 KODACHROME 25 (KM) 出售?好似要向KODAK 訂貨...
暗攝者燈燈 |
新進會員
|
quote:
quote:
quote:
有冇人用過 Kodak 160 VC Prof.?
唔知係咪技術問題，我用左幾次 160VC／160NC ，出黎既效果都係好怪既，效果好似顏色啞左，無乜色彩，而且紅色方面好似好濃，唔知點解？
水中月
要搵岩曬相舖至得‥‥唔係間間有160channel‥‥冇既話分分鐘當你200沖‥‥即係晒氣‥‥
得歡笑時且歡笑
我用開vc160/200 唔錯呀,不過上次心急是但去左間哂(Kodak沖) 個店員睇左2分鐘都唔知呢筒係咩菲林............ 最後? 就哂到好似頭先位人兄咁...
|
新進會員
|
i will recommend NPH 400 ( ISO set at 320)or extra 400 for negative,
though u can set tripod in the exhibition , but in taking pics with flower and /or insects , u need macro and tripod not much use or lack of flexibility , another point in taking macro is that the depth of field is narrow, so u probably need to stop down the aperture, so high speed , fine film has its advantages in handholding situation.sometime u even need flash!!
for me , NPH400 is a good negative , esp . set at 320, u can more saturated images.grain fine , but of course not as fine as reala.
extra just give u good value for money.
concerning Kodak 160VC, my experience is that it also is a fine film , and quite saturated , i don't encounter the problems in D&P as others mentioned , and the result is satisfactory. But the cons is the relative slow film speed.
concerning the positive , K64/25 of course has the best genuine color tone , but it's expensive , need to order , and mail to overseas for developing.One probelm is the reciprocity , as it need compensation and coorection filter if exposure time longer than 1/10 sec, as mentioned in the Kodak formal site.,so long esposure will be a problem, while Fuji velvia, provia, or astia , is much more easily available, cheaper, and less prone to reciprocity problem. Provia up to 2 mins. , and astia up to 1 min. and need no compensation.
so choose of positive depends on your need and degree of professional skills and of course money...., also K64/25 has no 120 versions, which is a pity for me!!!
|
新進會員
|
[quote]
支持KODACHROME! KODACHROME萬萬歲!!
說真的, 只有KODACHROME可以包容最濃郁的色彩之時, 還保持解像度, 不會像E6菲林的, 要紅時加一PAT番茄漿, 要藍時漸變地方沒有了, 要綠時就搶到生菜變菜心....
負片有分別, 不過永遠少於打相師父既分別, 又少過沖洗藥水新舊的分別. 不是到LAB沖晒, 甚麼負片都沒有大分別.
I always have the tomato juice problem with fuji positive or negative films whereas I come across purple, red or deep pink flowers, I thought it were due to my improper exposure.
In my limited experience, I find Kodak Supra 100 could recover pink color, while Reala is good for yellow and green.
For positive, why not give a trial with EPR or E100SW? |
新進會員
|
K64 costs me HK$68(including the slide developing charges), while 100SW cost HK$43.
68-43 =HK25 for slide developing charges,
Sound so not so expensive.
100SW results a warm tone while 100VS might be better for color reproduction.
But Why don't use Elite?how about the comments on it?
暗攝者燈燈 |
新進會員
|
concerning the tomato juice problem, i personally used extra 400 negative to take a tomato pic in flower exhibition before ( may be 2001/2000?)and it was one of my favourite in that series, i didn't encounter the tomato juice problem , and the grain was acceptable in 16 x20 size photo.
may be it is related to D & P , or lens property, ( i use minolta 200mm/f2.8 + 2x converter.that's one of the cons of negatives, which depends lot of D& P skills.
for the positive , i haven't much experience about elite,
for E100VS , the color was saturated , but color reproduction , i think , is a bit exaggerated , just as velvia, which both of them will give u " pop up " feeling, but in genuine world , the objects seldom present /look like this.that 's why many people like K64, which i think is best for color rendition , not so "pop up" , but just as natural as the genuine object.another alternative will be Fuji Astia, which is a fine grain, "natural " positive.
U can look at the discussions posted in photo.net concerning properties of different films.
anyway, just pick up the camera ,and enjoy the shooting !! :)
|
新進會員
|
Like "which camera", everyone give have their own preference of films. In terms of flowers, it is extremely hard for one film to get accurate results for all differnet colors. One film may be better in yellow while one may be better in red. Purple is one hard color.
Of course, we are not scientists trying to document the flower samples. So, a bit off is OK.
Anyway, most of the people has not recommended a cheap consumer film. My recommendation is do not use cheap film.
I hope after the flower show, everyone can post some photos of flowers using their recommended film and we can learn more about films
|
新進會員
|
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
有冇人用過 Kodak 160 VC Prof.?
唔知係咪技術問題，我用左幾次 160VC／160NC ，出黎既效果都係好怪既，效果好似顏色啞左，無乜色彩，而且紅色方面好似好濃，唔知點解？
水中月
要搵岩曬相舖至得‥‥唔係間間有160channel‥‥冇既話分分鐘當你200沖‥‥即係晒氣‥‥
得歡笑時且歡笑
我用開vc160/200 唔錯呀,不過上次心急是但去左間哂(Kodak沖) 個店員睇左2分鐘都唔知呢筒係咩菲林............ 最後? 就哂到好似頭先位人兄咁...
請問邊度晒好 vc160 會晒到筒菲林既質素?
咁reala 又使唔使話要特別咁去沖晒? 如果拎去快圖美有冇問題? |
