網路會員
|
PENTAX的確唔合年輕人.轉canon啦. >此話何解? |
網路會員
|
Shoot shoot shoot till you identify the limitations of your system, before any serious upgrade.
Upgrade is much more eaiser than shooting at cutting edge.
|
網路會員
|
pentax因為保守落午(部機祗可以影相!又冇眼控;又冇45點對焦,又冇usm.又冇張連拍).死古古冇function. 用pentax=outdate(唔in);=不合年輕人. |
網路會員
|
to Karry: 佢冇USM但有POWER ZOOM, 仲有邊個話佢無連拍?至於眼控......我識大部份用CANON既多數都會disable this function....so what do you think? and the 45focus points... mainly very useful when you using AF Servo... but iu would like to use 1 point to pan vehicles... one thing i just want to say: each brand have its own characteristic... i"m using pentax and i"m 20~~~ so what do you think? of course, canon has the best technique on its developing camera, so if 3asv71 guy want to change system... you got the right choice to be canon but... the good quality lens... also expansive as CMPN... |
網路會員
|
sorry is AI servo |
網路會員
|
Dibri:
你唔夠IN LAW! 苯到死要苯人先可以用!先可以抵受別人歧視嘛. 唔洗冤枉錢點買沒用的新科技! 但POWER ZOOM真係幾食電. |
網路會員
|
pentax因為保守落午(部機祗可以影相!又冇眼控;又冇45點對焦,又冇usm.又冇張連拍).死古古冇function. 用pentax=outdate(唔in);=不合年輕人. ------------------------- 嘩~~咁我咪超老 食并? 我用FM2嫁,又冇AF,又冇AE,對焦點係"零"點,冇連拍之餘仲要手動過片,影完仲要自己"搞",FUNCTION係有光圈同快門,自拍SET死10秒,仲要唔係好準,縮光圈/景深預視都要手動唔係電子~ 小弟剛剛18~! |
網路會員
|
玩PENTAX係因為佢D鏡, 唔係佢既機身. 好多新手都係貪機身夠PRO, 亦希望多人用易埋堆, 以PENTAX多年特性, 基本上只係適合老O野用, 尤其是鍾情於中古鏡頭果堆. 至於POWER ZOOM, PENTAX都唔再做, 証明係失敗之下, 不談也罷.
|
網路會員
|
POWER ZOOM我未用過,但係都想像得到實用性超低,試問你一百張相之中有幾多張係用會到拉爆? 小弟係零張~~~ PS:其實係因為我唔用變焦鏡:P
要創新? MINOLTA啦,創新到你唔信 |
網路會員
|
插個花,希望唔好介意(又試成頁我d post=-="),唔即刻打低問轉頭會唔記得,然後今晚臨訓就諗起,跟住就會心思思集中唔到精神睇書=_= 點解canon人咁鍾意錐求550EX? 真係會成日用? 用手動機的人多數都唔"興"、唔鍾意用閃燈的...... 係咪因為大家影既題材唔同,af影人、mf影風景? 真奇怪~~~ |
網路會員
|
買CANON唔通用NIKON燈咩.....
|
網路會員
|
3asv71 兄︰
唉!睇左呢條 thread 咁耐,睇黎你講來講去,個心都係飛左去 Canon 個邊,不如下定決心,找找有乜野 Canon Body & Lens 好買仲好,免得夜長夢多。咁樣講唔係串你,而係我自己以前都有咁樣既經歷,免得痛苦者。 |
網路會員
|
咁用pentax就真係差好多, 代理屎過屎撈人, 鏡難搵過恐龍, 機身設計又保守, DSLR又只係得一部咁大把, 就連買個原廠鏡頭蓋都可以行穿對鞋.....
|
網路會員
|
賓得落後?呢樣反而又唔覺wo,冇一d牌子咁多高科技花臣都唔代表係老餅落 後,好似部*ist 同*istD,有晒業餘機既function,但就配上一個入門機身既年 輕形象,不過形象年輕到連我都唔敢買:P(自問買機睇function之餘都幾睇外表 XDDDDD)
其實好多謝大家既意見,唔少意見都好有用同參考價值,不過最後我會點揀,都 係等EOS30/33V出先作最後定論,仲有成個月諗,不過無論最後會點揀,都唔代 表會放棄其他一套,好可能最後揀返用Pentax,到唔知幾耐之後又係轉投其他牌 子懷抱,又或者最後揀左轉Canon,亦難保唔知幾耐之後又係回頭轉返Pentax都 唔定,最好當然兩套機一齊玩啦 XDD..或者咁樣試來試去某程度上都係另一樣 趣味來呢(哈,講下好啦,就算有咁多時間去試去撞都冇咁多錢啦 XDDDDDDD)
仍然係新手一名,希望大家繼續指教啦 :) |
網路會員
|
咁用pentax就真係差好多, 代理屎過屎撈人, 鏡難搵過恐龍, 機身設計又保守, DSLR又只係得一部咁大把, 就連買個原廠鏡頭蓋都可以行穿對鞋..... -------------------------------------------------
哈哈..呢個真係事實,0個次同朋友去代理整某韓牌MP3機先知原來Pentax 係邊間代理同埋邊度係showroom..不過佢地個showroom show出來既野原來都 唔係多過乜成物成好多,死未?!~_~ |
論壇版主
|
希望MZ3唔好停產啦...
|
網路會員
|
希望MZ3唔好停產啦... >都停左好耐啦~ >你應該話: >希望pentax出部正過MZ-3嫁啦
買CANON唔通用NIKON燈咩..... >唔係講咩牌子咩型號既問題,而係閃燈似乎係好多買af機人士既必備架親,講550EX只不過係因為佢好似特別受到"錐棒"
我既問題其實係: 點解用af機既人寧願買少支鏡都要買閃燈先? 係咪因為大家影既題材唔同,af影人、mf影風景? |
網路會員
|
If I have a mz-50 and two zoom lens like 3asv71, I will make these upgrade: MZ-6 body for $1600 or MZ-5 for $2200 ( at stanly street, new old stock ) - both of them can use old manual pentax lens or even M42 lens, which is good and cheap 2nd hand Pentax AF220T ( at tin cheung ) for $300 - with bounce head for $300 pentax 28-70MM F4 for $11XX - budget fixed aperture lens 2nd hand pentax 50MM lens for under $500 use two old tele zoom, since I need 300MM and won"t paid for a F2.8 fixed aperture tele-zoom. total $3600 - $4000
For Me, if I can find a new MZ-3 or MZ-5N and I need a AF Slr, I will paid for it with 43MM F1.9. ( I have using a nikon FG and contax T3 ) |
網路會員
|
>要創新? MINOLTA啦,創新到你唔信
I suppose the real reason is that Canon has had USM & IS for quite some time. Both are useful technologies. Being innovative is one thing, but the end products must be practical and useful. And Canon got the right vision when they designed the EOS "system".
>點解canon人咁鍾意錐求550EX? 真係會成日用?
I am not familiar with Canon flashes, but high end flashes often have variable manual output which is essential for well balanced exposure imho. This is one feature mid-low end flashes cannot achieve (but I do hope they exist because I prefer to carry smaller flash).
>用手動機的人多數都唔"興"、唔鍾意用閃燈的
I am not sure I agree with this. Flash is part of photography, and unavoidable in some situations. It is not whether like it or not, but essential sometimes. Just like filters, some filters are useful.
>希望pentax出部正過MZ-3嫁啦
I believe they considered MZ-S is the upgrade of MZ-3. |
網路會員
|
"POWER ZOOM我未用過,但係都想像得到實用性超低,試問你一百張相之中有幾多張係用會到拉爆?" Although this function is not accepted by most P users, I am quite happy with it. It really help me to take quicker shots. This is my subjective view. "玩PENTAX係因為佢D鏡, 唔係佢既機身." Yes, I need a user friendly with all neccessary functions body only.
|