新進會員
|
Would Canon make lens better than Nikon? ************* 各有長處姐, 邊有gum絕對... :p |
新進會員
|
Canon部份長鏡的確好正, 不過wide鏡就真係麻麻地.
|
新進會員
|
"D2H畫質未必好好, 不過一秒八格及極少既shutter lag, CANON真係比得上? 再者, NIKON出D2X時, CANON又會點?"
Canon 1D 已是兩年前既產品, 兩年後既D2H 比它好D又算得上甚麼呢! 1Ds 已出了一段時間, N 記又点呢? 兩年後.....?
|
新進會員
|
咁又係~~~~Canon 出USM 鏡好多年, Nikon 先出 AFS...........
|
新進會員
|
>> Canon 1D 已是兩年前既產品, 兩年後既D2H 比它好D又算得上甚麼呢!
1D推出之時, 可能不少人也為CANON歡呼吧...那今天的D2H, 是否也應該持同樣的態度去支持同鼓勵.
|
新進會員
|
甚麼都有可能呀...
無線傳相最終都一定會成為必需品, 現在明顯nikon 是在canon 領先的層面以外殺一條血路出黎...
nikon 已有幾件好野, 一是數碼的wide 鏡, 現在出 d2h 快, 再加上無線上網... canon 真係要加把勁... |
新進會員
|
"1D推出之時, 可能不少人也為CANON歡呼吧...那今天的D2H, 是否也應該持同樣的態度去支持同鼓勵."
如在兩年前,我絕對會為它鼓掌和歡呼.... |
新進會員
|
我部pocket pc 都可以無線上綱, 如D2H可以加埋 internet browser 重好, 冇相影時可以玩下internet.... |
新進會員
|
唔知Nikon幾時先出full size CCD呢?? |
新進會員
|
personally, i guess 短期內(2-3years) 都唔出住
because they got DX lens 家族..... |
新進會員
|
agree ! |
新進會員
|
NIKON的DX鏡已經解決WIDE ANGLE問題, 現在只是等待DX鏡系多一些大光圈鏡吧.
|
新進會員
|
IMHO, all these are just moot since neither C nor N can produce cheap enough sensor with enough yield rate to warrant large scale production, and being small scale, any of these high end DSLR will have to be priced likely and thus geared toward the PRO market .......... now read this, but they are not selling enough to get money for R&D into the next generation sinc many PRO have found that they are better off using the mid-range DSLR or even entry range DSLR and prosumer DC. - These are where all the actions are.
All these Top end models are brand prestige and serve as stepping stone and technology road-burner for the mass market line. In fact when you take a careful look at the DC & DSLR market. You will notice a marked slow down of new models introduction and this is a healthy sign since its consolidation time .... Now any of the Mfr must prove their products worth instead of relying on hype .....
|
新進會員
|
仲要其他野配合…咭…電… |
新進會員
|
NIKON比CANON遲許多年才有AFS, 其中原因可能與專利有關. 如當年PENTAX發明了SMC這個多層加膜, 拿了專利25年, 情況 一如真空罩, 別的廠家沒有可能用這技術生產, 要從新發展 又極之困難, 唯有比專利稅買技術. USM是否如此? 剛好十年, 想一想吧.
|
新進會員
|
"IS" patented by a small company that Canon bought it and own it after they invented USM. I guess other Nikon "VR" also need to pay the patent fee although it is with different name but actually the same technique with IS. Minolta just use other method to achieve similar effect on its A1. I guess Minolta also patented this alternative methods. |